Sig Sauer has filed a lawsuit against a Plaintiffs' Attorney for defamation regarding illustrations on his website that claim to demonstrate how the sear design on the P320 leads to "un-commanded discharges". If the drawings presented in this article are accurate, then Sig may have a valid claim. What's your take on it? Is Sig supporting the 2nd Amendment by standing up against the frivolous lawsuits that threaten to bankrupt gun manufacturers, or are they just another big-money corporation trying to cover-up a legitimate safety issue by scaring away any attorneys who dare to represent innocent victims?
SIG SAUER Sues Attorney Jeffrey Bagnell for Allegedly False and Defamatory Statements About the Safety of the P320 Pistol - The Truth About Guns
◀Previous Post Next Post▶ Last August I wrote about lawsuits filed against SIG SAUER alleging that their ultra-popular P320 striker-fired pistol is prone to “un-commanded discharges.” In plain English, the plaintiffs — many of whom are law enforcement officers — say their P320s “went off,”...