Search results

Personally, I don't feel those freedoms should have to be restored. I don't think they should ever be removed. I also believe that we should have much stiffer penalties in the first place.

But it's not shooting to kill and it's not semantics. I have been through the trainings. I can't say much becuase it's an ongoing cases, but I have a friend facing charges right now and I guarantee you that how he testifies will not be semantics. Are there people with badges and firearms...

But they aren't doing mag dumps to shoot to kill. They're doing mag dumps becuase they are human beings. They are reacting to a perceived fear, and we critters act irrationally out of fear. If you ask most people who have discharged their firearm after a critical incident, they can't tell you...

No officer shoots center mass to kill, they shoot center mass as it's the biggest, easiest target. And they're not shooting to kill, they're shooting to stop the threat. If the bad guys goes down and is still alive, but out of the fight, perfect. They're not continuing to shoot to make sure...

We buy the Southern Comfort Eggnon - doesn't have alcohol in it, just flavored. I have been putting touch of bourbon in mine, really good stuff if you get the ratio right

The good news is that I think SCOTUS/the Feds are going to drop the hammer on states having restrictive gun laws. I think we're going to have a few good years ahead

In theory, sure. But that's already not legal. There are already anti-discrimination laws in place. You can't refuse to serve someone just becuase of their race, age, gender identity, sexual orientation...there are already laws on the books that prevents that. All I am saying is that in that...

That's one of the reasons why I don't think there should be any "process." It should be automatic. Not in jail/prison, not on probation/parole, you have gun rights. Easy peasy. But, again, just my opinion

I respectfully disagree. I think there are cameras in FAR TOO MANY places already. We're living in a dystopia where you can't go out in public without being recorded somewhere. I prefer carrying firearms EVERYWHERE. I would much prefer the shooter be met with armed resistance than recorded to...

what defines a "private business". If you allow the general public in, then, you're not private. My opinion is that property rights extend to your domicile. But, that's just my opinion

In theory, sure. But I am thinking more of discrimination angle. A business can't legally discriminate access to it's business for race, religions, sexual orientation, etc...they are are all protected. I don't see why we allow the 2A to be treated differently. I do allow for two...

I have the utmost respect for my brothers behind the wall. I want nothing to do with working on the inside. And to be clear, I am definitely not saying that these guys are all better once they get out. I'm also not saying there wouldn't be some danger in letting this happen. I am just sayng...

I am 100% for this. Actually, I'm for people not having their rights removed in the first place. While you're in jail, of course, no weapons. But once you're out, back to normal. I MIGHT make a concession for folks on parole/probation as they are still serving their sentence, so they aren't...

I have said it before, I'll say it again, and I will die on this hill. Property owner's "right's" shouldn't extend to a business open to the general public. And they can't be selective on what rights they allow customers to use. Walmart can't ban someone from entering just becuase of their...

You shouldn't have to choose where you live based on you're desire to use your rights? Again, we allow the 2A to be treated as a second class right. We would never allow a landlord to restrict someone's rights to worship, or to vote, but yet we allow them to trample our 2A rights. It makes...

But they shouldn't be allowed to put restriction in that limit your constitutional rights. A landlord can't limit your first amendment rights. It would never be allowed to have a contract that says if you live here you must agree to give up your right to worship. You can live here, but you're...

:ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: It just doesn't seem to serve a purpose anymore.

You're rights don't change becuase your address does.

You certainly have a right to your OPINION. You don't have the right to trample other people's rights becuase of your opinion, though. School shootings, including college campuses, are terrible. But they're also already illegal. It's illegal to shoot someone for no reason, it's called murder...

I have no issue with this. Guns should be allowed on campuses and in dorm rooms. I am an 2A absolutist. I don't see anything that says "unless you are away at college." I also don't think simply possessing somethign should be illegal - unless we're talking kidnapping LOL...