testtest

"Belly Armor for SouthEast Asia is not deemed a legitimate requirement...."

Ascout

Elite
This interesting document further reveals the cavalier nature of AMC’s attitude with regard to crew protection in the M551 Sheridan. On request, an add-on mineplate kit had been developed for the M551 as deployed in Vietnam. The kit added 1400 lbs and it was concluded based upon empirical testing that it would contribute toward preventing hull rupture specifically. Fire, secondary to a detonation was the immediate risk to the dummy occupants of the test vehicle. The dummy’s had benefited from restraining harnesses developed for the M551 but not installed on production vehicles. They were not subjected to the same accelerations of the floor unrestrained, referred to as blast displacement.
In large anti-vehicular mine explosions such as those in Vietnam, where the average mine was 30lbs or greater, one of the mechanisms of casualty-causing injuries is the result of the accelerations of the floor of your vehicle coming up to meet you at great speed (“blast displacement” in the memo). The test was conducted with a 22lb, charge. This combination of factors perhaps led to the conclusion that mine plates for Vietnam-bound M551’s were not advisable. Their reference to the large “charges” in use, (which I believed suffered a typo in the document), seems to have led to a conclusion that in view of the severe damage that can be expected, a mine plate will be of little difference to crew survivability. (Even if hull rupture is prevented, the “blast displacement” will kill you anyway). Note that even with a “mere” 22 lb charge, the M551 in the test may have been blown completely clear of the ground.
The proposal, if USARV insisted on the kits, was to have them sent to SEA for installation. Before the document could even be distributed, USARV confirmed that they indeed wanted the kits. Notice that decisions had been run by the Vice Chief of Staff of the Army, who had been called upon to "referee" Sheridan acceptance and deployment.
I've combined two messy pages into one. Both memos can be more easily read if downloaded and magnified with your photo viewer.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot (266)EditSm.jpg
    Screenshot (266)EditSm.jpg
    75 KB · Views: 15
  • Screenshot (269)Sm.jpg
    Screenshot (269)Sm.jpg
    66 KB · Views: 14
  • SEAMineKitComboSm.jpg
    SEAMineKitComboSm.jpg
    216.6 KB · Views: 13
May not be required, but would be helpful on saving lives possibly. The gub'nt not great on decision making when it comes to lives not their own!
More particularly, 1969 was a watershed year and some elements wanted the vehicle standardized regardless of the requirements it failed to meet because "without it our defensive posture in 'Urp would lack credibility, blah, blah..."
The addition of the mine plate meant yet another requirement not met...the "swim" capability. (Not that it was met in spirit anyway). The weight was fast approaching TWICE the original requirement of ten tons.
 
Thankfully, by 1976 we had the full belly armor kit installed and, as the schematic notes, retained the functionality of the escape hatch. BTW, the 551A1 still moved out martly with no degradation to mobility IMO.
Yes, the swim requirement was a joke. The flotation barrier was a maintenance PITA we had to wash out periodically or the thing would rot. We never swam ours, ever.
 
Thankfully, by 1976 we had the full belly armor kit installed and, as the schematic notes, retained the functionality of the escape hatch. BTW, the 551A1 still moved out martly with no degradation to mobility IMO.
Yes, the swim requirement was a joke. The flotation barrier was a maintenance PITA we had to wash out periodically or the thing would rot. We never swam ours, ever.
The escape hatch was rendered non-functional with the VN mineplate kit. Most drivers who survived a mine strike reported being blown out of the regular hatch. The gap in the central piece of the schematic was just to clear the hatch. The main plate covered it.
If you enjoyed your M551A1 (with Hughes LASER RF) I can tell you that I enjoyed testing it. One of the few bits of robust hardware in the FCS and the same system as on the M60A2 (which I also tested). Did you have TTS on your A1? This was after my time and I'd like to establish if units other than the 37th AR had TTS Sheridans.
 

Attachments

  • LaserRFEbd.jpg
    LaserRFEbd.jpg
    857.3 KB · Views: 6
The escape hatch was rendered non-functional with the VN mineplate kit. Most drivers who survived a mine strike reported being blown out of the regular hatch. The gap in the central piece of the schematic was just to clear the hatch. The main plate covered it.
If you enjoyed your M551A1 (with Hughes LASER RF) I can tell you that I enjoyed testing it. One of the few bits of robust hardware in the FCS and the same system as on the M60A2 (which I also tested). Did you have TTS on your A1? This was after my time and I'd like to establish if units other than the 37th AR had TTS Sheridans.
Loved the LRF. We did not have TTS. The first time I heard of TTS on Sheridans was Desert Shield/Storm with 72d Armor of the 82d Airborne, but I never had personal experience with it.
 
Loved the LRF. We did not have TTS. The first time I heard of TTS on Sheridans was Desert Shield/Storm with 72d Armor of the 82d Airborne, but I never had personal experience with it.
This is consistent with the picture I'm getting of TTS (on Sheridan, not M60A3) only being installed on vehicles in the 82nd, the 37AR, IIRC. The majority of them elsewhere (and maybe all of them) were not so equipped.
 
Back
Top