testtest

Joe Biden Diagnosed with cancer

Model 457 said:
So get this. CNN just interviewed a "World Renowned Oncologist". According to this expert, Biden's cancer could have easily been missed because men over 70 are not screened for prostate cancer. Furthermore, it is VERY possible that Biden did not have this cancer during his presidency. Apparently this type of cancer can go from nonexistent to stage 4 in a matter of days. So again, the ignorant public cannot trust what they've seen, heard, or experienced throughout their lifetimes.
Click to expand...
I heard three different doctors say the opposite today. Although it is possible they didn't screen him. The age they stop doing that is 80 though. A PSA test is normal though and would have, except in extremely rare cases, showed elevated PSAs with the type and severity of cancer he has. Enough to warrant further examination. And with him being the president they damn sure would have screened him or attempted to unless he refused it.

In any case, Jill Biden should be run out of town on a rail.
 
Model 457 said:
Yeah, I think I've mentioned before I hate watch CNN every now and then. You apparently didn't sense the sarcasm dripping from my post. I wish CNN would just go away because I'm gonna rage stroke watching that garbage someday.
Click to expand...
I understand, but when your diagnosed with a form of cancer and the fake news makes outrageous statements, it just doesn’t go well with me
 
i would not wish cancer on anyone
i do find it ODD that sunday they dropped the news, after we listened to the tapes all weekend

i wish the people that were doing the elder abuse and keeping him in office to enrich their own lives would get flame sprayed
and joe is taken care of and cured if possible. for it to get in his bones so fast, makes me wonder if they knew and were hush puppy until he left office.
i tell you his handlers really took elder abuse to new levels
 
Talyn said:
This condition manifests itself over time so POTUS 46 had either incompetant medical attention or it was another "cover-up" like all the rest.
Click to expand...
I always wondered why he didn't run in 2016. It was his best chance ever. The VP of Obama riding that wave? Come on, man! He maybe could've walked all over Bernie and Hillary.

As ambitious as he is? He wanted the presidency since he entered politics back in the early 1600s. He couldn't wait for his time as VP to end so he could try for the big chair.

Then when the time came, they asked and he said "Nahhhh"?

He said then it was because of losing his son Beau, but that didn't cause him to resign as VP and it didn't keep him from running four years later.

I think we now know why he didn't run in '16:
Probably because he had been diagnosed with this cancer by then. The timing fits.
 
Hi,

BarryinIN said:
I always wondered why he didn't run in 2016. It was his best chance ever. The VP of Obama riding that wave? Come on, man! He maybe could've walked all over Bernie and Hillary.

As ambitious as he is? He wanted the presidency since he entered politics back in the early 1600s. He couldn't wait for his time as VP to end so he could try for the big chair.

Then when the time came, they asked and he said "Nahhhh"?

He said then it was because of losing his son Beau, but that didn't cause him to resign as VP and it didn't keep him from running four years later.

I think we now know why he didn't run in '16:
Probably because he had been diagnosed with this cancer by then. The timing fits.
Click to expand...

I think Joe didn't run in 2016 because the Democrat oligarchich panopticon wanted Hillary.


Thank you for your indulgence,

BassCliff
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top