shanneba
Professional
A detailed analysis of the Jan. 6 pipe bombs found new problems with the FBI evidence and advances the notion that the case could turn out to be a government-created hoax.
A video engineer who spent more than a year examining the pipe bomb evidence submitted a 26-page report to the House Select Subcommittee to Investigate the Remaining Questions Surrounding Jan. 6.
His report includes a number of surprises, including the contention that the DNC pipe bomb was planted on Jan. 5, retrieved a few hours later so it wouldn’t be discovered too soon, and placed again just in time for two police officers to discover it at 1:05 p.m. Jan. 6.
He also says video released by the FBI was digitally altered to make it more difficult to identify a suspect.
www.theblaze.com
A video engineer who spent more than a year examining the pipe bomb evidence submitted a 26-page report to the House Select Subcommittee to Investigate the Remaining Questions Surrounding Jan. 6.
His report includes a number of surprises, including the contention that the DNC pipe bomb was planted on Jan. 5, retrieved a few hours later so it wouldn’t be discovered too soon, and placed again just in time for two police officers to discover it at 1:05 p.m. Jan. 6.
He also says video released by the FBI was digitally altered to make it more difficult to identify a suspect.

Video sleuth challenges FBI Jan. 6 pipe-bomb narrative, unearths new evidence | Blaze Media
A yearlong investigation found doctored evidence and shows the intended bomb targets were not where the devices were found.
