Why Were Guns Absent During Presidential Debate?

[Annihilator]

I did wonder why this wasn’t brought up in the debate, nice read and maybe some truth to there conclusion

Why Were Guns Absent During Presidential Debate?

When Surgeon General Vivek Murthy declared so-called gun violence a

bearingarms.com

 

[Talyn]

JBs mumbling took up too much time.

 

[HayesGreener]

It's a poison pill for democrat campaigns in most of the country

 

[papa]

Look , I talked to the Surgeon General and he said a 9 MM will blow the lungs right out of a human body. This why nothing was said about guns.

LGB had enough trouble trying to answer the questions put to him.

 

[Hawgleg44]

I did wonder why this wasn’t brought up in the debate, nice read and maybe some truth to there conclusion

Why Were Guns Absent During Presidential Debate?

When Surgeon General Vivek Murthy declared so-called gun violence a

bearingarms.com

No talk of the 2nd amendment. That was the very first thing on my mind after the debate ended.

 

[SimonRL]

That’s actually a pretty sophomoric take on it. The battle cry to an election has and always will be “It’s the Economy Stupid!”

Neither candidate is going to provide voters on either side of the gun control issue an A Ha moment when the lightbulb goes on and that person says - you know what he’s right, so why poke the bear? Gun rights has never been a factor in a national election and with the NRA still recovering from the ND to both their feet, this election won’t be any different. The whole theme of the debate was, quite intentionally, He’s a Piece of S*** and He’s Too Old and Incompetent and as it happens, they were both right.

 

[KillerFord1977]

My take on the debate:

 

[Onewolf426]