testtest

New Sig Sauer product...

Talyn

Talyn

Emissary
Founding Member
Sig Sauer is experimenting with pistol-armed quadcopters that a single person can carry and employ because, as one spokesman has put it, "why wouldn't we?"

www.thedrive.com

P365 Pistol-Armed Aerial Drone Put On Display By Sig Sauer

When asked why Sig Sauer went through the trouble of creating a drone with a P365 pistol, they said "Why wouldn't we?"
www.thedrive.com www.thedrive.com

1697062290418.png


The FAA and ATF may have to team up on this one.
 
Now that's scary right there. Kinda reminds of the older movie BLUE THUNDER with Roy Scheider. That helicopter in the movie was armed, had sensitive hearing technology oh and the whisper mode so people didn't know she was flying. Just watched it the other night. Makes you wonder if they actually do have and use that technology...
 
Talyn said:
Sig Sauer is experimenting with pistol-armed quadcopters that a single person can carry and employ because, as one spokesman has put it, "why wouldn't we?"

www.thedrive.com

P365 Pistol-Armed Aerial Drone Put On Display By Sig Sauer

When asked why Sig Sauer went through the trouble of creating a drone with a P365 pistol, they said "Why wouldn't we?"
www.thedrive.com www.thedrive.com

View attachment 45036

The FAA and ATF may have to team up on this one.
Click to expand...
The FAA is de-facto involved via the GPS on the quadcopter that would restrict flying in dangerous or controlled zones, although some jackasses have managed to do it and fly a DJI next to a commercial airliner.

Honestly, there's nothing that complicated in there that anybody couldn't do on their own. I bet the stabilization software is good enough on a most likely $5K quadcopter to recover from the recoil fast and fly well... Hovering and shooting several shot quickly might be slightly harder.

This seems like a silly gimmick for scoring marketing points, there are flamethrower quadcopter available, $1,500 no license necessary, friggin' frightening!

1697063305713.png


And there's always the Smart Shooter SMASH out of Israel, that one is a seriously big *** mofo

1697063381204.png
 
wolfpack076 said:
Now that's scary right there. Kinda reminds of the older movie BLUE THUNDER with Roy Scheider. That helicopter in the movie was armed, had sensitive hearing technology oh and the whisper mode so people didn't know she was flying. Just watched it the other night. Makes you wonder if they actually do have and use that technology...
Click to expand...
If they do you’d never know.
 
Talyn said:
Sig Sauer is experimenting with pistol-armed quadcopters that a single person can carry and employ because, as one spokesman has put it, "why wouldn't we?"

www.thedrive.com

P365 Pistol-Armed Aerial Drone Put On Display By Sig Sauer

When asked why Sig Sauer went through the trouble of creating a drone with a P365 pistol, they said "Why wouldn't we?"
www.thedrive.com www.thedrive.com

View attachment 45036

The FAA and ATF may have to team up on this one.
Click to expand...
I see nothing good whatsoever coming from the development of this, totally unnecessary for anyone outside of the military.
 
wolfpack076 said:
Now that's scary right there. Kinda reminds of the older movie BLUE THUNDER with Roy Scheider. That helicopter in the movie was armed, had sensitive hearing technology oh and the whisper mode so people didn't know she was flying. Just watched it the other night. Makes you wonder if they actually do have and use that technology...
Click to expand...
Well, think about this. The A-12/SR-71 first flew in 1964; yeah almost 50 years ago. What they have now would be mind-boggling. BTW, when they took the SR-71 out of service, they brought a few of them back in the late 90s. They found out with the satellite coverage we had at the time they could not be retasked in a timely manner, so the SR-71s had an encore performance for a few years.
 
Cedric said:
Well, think about this. The A-12/SR-71 first flew in 1964; yeah almost 50 years ago. What they have now would be mind-boggling. BTW, when they took the SR-71 out of service, they brought a few of them back in the late 90s. They found out with the satellite coverage we had at the time they could not be retasked in a timely manner, so the SR-71s had an encore performance for a few years.
Click to expand...
Heck U2 are still flying missions for the CIA, that's even older. Same with B52 and C-130. Even though the airframe is old, the electronics inside has been redone many times over and is top notch. What we do even better now with electronics warfare is have "pretend" bogies that would fool any electronics. So when we see UFO radar "proof", it's just that, digital make believe.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top