U.S. Strikes three Iranian Nuclear Sites

[Talyn]

Dems now calling for SJT to be impeached.

Funny how they didn't say any of that for POTUS 44.

 

[Talyn]

News now saying sub-launched 30 TLAM cruise missiles also used.

Six GBU-57 "MOBE" bunker busters dropped on Fordow facility.

 

[Bassbob]

Someday, we’re gonna learn that our F’ing about in that region does not work out well for us in the end—eg: first gulf war directly leading formation of Al Qaeda and 9/11, second gulf war directly leading to formation of ISIS, etc…

But not today.

Wonder how many Americans this bull$hit will end up killing…any number is gonna be too many.

I generally speaking agree with this not F'ing around in things that don't concern us. In this case I don't. Iran has sent assassins here to kill our president and other leaders. They have no business having nuclear weapons, period.

In this case we are ( so far) only targeting the nukes. Nukes which they were never suppose to have according to the IAEA.

 

[Bassbob]

Name one time—one—that US intervention since the 1950’s in that region has made things better for the people there.

One example.

It could easily be argued that Iraqis are better today than they were under Sadaam. That said, I don't think invading Iraq was a good idea.

 

[HansGruber]

I generally speaking agree with this not F'ing around in things that don't concern us. In this case I don't. Iran has sent assassins here to kill our president and other leaders. They have no business having nuclear weapons, period.

In this case we are ( so far) only targeting the nukes. Nukes which they were never suppose to have according to the IAEA.

Uh-huh.

Same nukes Iraq had?

We’ve heard this song and dance before…

 

[Bassbob]

Uh-huh.

Same nukes Iraq had?

We’ve heard this song and dance before…

No one said Iraq had nukes.

It's pretty well known and widely believed Iran does/did. If you think they don't you are an outlier brother.

 

[HansGruber]

It could easily be argued that Iraqis are better today than they were under Sadaam. That said, I don't think invading Iraq was a good idea.

He slaughtered thousands of Shiite resistors after we left them to die in the 1990’s.

Over 100k Iraqis were killed during the us invasion/occupation.

I don’t think they have it better…

 

[HansGruber]

No one said Iraq had nukes.

It's pretty well known and widely believed Iran does/did. If you think they don't you are an outlier brother.

Colin Powell said they had nukes in front of the UN.

“Yellow cake”, etc, etc…

 

[Bassbob]

Colin Powell said they had nukes in front of the UN.

“Yellow cake”, etc, etc…

Weapons of mass destruction. I have never heard anyone claim Bush said he had nukes. Chemical weapons. And he did have them.

 

[HansGruber]

No one said Iraq had nukes.

It's pretty well known and widely believed Iran does/did. If you think they don't you are an outlier brother.

Additionally, our own Director of National Intelligence stated they don’t have nukes only a few months ago…and didn’t change her tune until Trump started to claim they did.

 

[Bassbob]

He slaughtered thousands of Shiite resistors after we left them to die in the 1990’s.

Over 100k Iraqis were killed during the us invasion/occupation.

I don’t think they have it better…

They think they do.

 

[HansGruber]

Weapons of mass destruction. I have never heard anyone claim Bush said he had nukes. Chemical weapons. And he did have them.

A nuke is a WMD by definition.

 

[Bassbob]

Additionally, our own Director of National Intelligence stated they don’t have nukes only a few months ago…and didn’t change her tune until Trump started to claim they did.

They don't have nukes. They have 60% enriched uranium. And the director actually thinks they had no intention of enriching for a weapon. Which makes her a moron.

 

[Bassbob]

A nuke is a WMD by definition.

Sure, but a WMD isn't a nuke by definition.

No one ever said Iraq had nukes as a pretext for the US invading them.

 

[HansGruber]

They don't have nukes. They have 60% enriched uranium. And the director actually thinks they had no intention of enriching for a weapon. Which makes her a moron.

Is there proof—actual proof—they were?

Or are we just assuming?

 

[Bassbob]

I trust Israeli intelligence with regards to Iran far more than our intelligence director.

 

[HansGruber]

Sure, but a WMD isn't a nuke by definition.

No one ever said Iraq had nukes as a pretext for the US invading them.

Iraq supposedly had “yellow cake” uranium, which is a—ahem—precursor.

Sound familiar?

 

[Bassbob]

Is there proof—actual proof—they were?

Or are we just assuming?

Just last week the IAEA found them in violation and made the determination they were hiding their nuclear program.

 

[Bassbob]

Iraq supposedly had “yellow cake” uranium, which is a—ahem—precursor.

Sound familiar?

I never heard that before either. WMD is the only thing that was said publicly in my recollection.

And yellow cake uranium is unenriched. As in 0%. It's essentially what you have immediately after mining it. Which has no indication of enriching for weapons. At all.

 

[HansGruber]

I trust Israeli intelligence with regards to Iran far more than our intelligence director.

I don’t.

They do not have the US’s best interests in mind, and would lie at the drop of a hat to pull us into their BS.

Remember—Israeli Intelligence greenlighted the attack on the USS Liberty…