testtest

Russian collusion hoax

From 42 years as an LEO, I know for certain nobody is getting convicted of anything without proof beyond a reasonable doubt, unless of course it is a kangaroo court. All I have seen so far is rumors, partial truths, political hyperbole, media sensationalism, insinuation and hate speech. One thing ai know for sure is that Marxists will stop at nothing, no lie is too great, to gain power. Some of the actors in all this drama may be guilty of crimes, but I want to see the proof. Until then, I am skeptical of everything being said.
 
If Clinton is in it, prosecute him.

If it’s wrong to give Clinton a pass, it’s just as wrong to give Trump a pass.

I don’t see how that’s such a hard concept to get.


I agree. But the issue here isn't whether or not Clinton is going to get a pass. He already has. How long has the public been talking about Clinton and Epstein ? The fact is no one knows anything about any of it and it's all just speculation. Belt Fed is correct. If there is a list, there's no way we're ever going to get a look at it. Clearly the people who might be on that list are important enough to scare the ones who aren't, but know who is from saying anything. Once again the current issue is Trump opening his stupid mouth. If Trump had been engaging in illegal acts with minors I seriously doubt he would have been using the Epstein list as a political tool pre-election. And if he was going to use it as a political tool pre election and after he was elected he was scared off of it, which seems possible, he should come out and say it. Then again, if there is a list there are a lot of people who would know about it and have access to it. Judges and others. Are we to believe that all the judges and officials are so biased that they would participate in what amounts to an open cover up just to protect some democrats/republicans who are on the list ?

It's all speculation. I seriously doubt Trump's enemies would give him a pass to protect one/some of their own though. If they could take him down they would.
 
And for the first time, we're not the nuclear aggressor.

We're still the only nation that's ever actually used a nuclear weapon. Twice.
I did a thesis in college back in the Stone Age on “The Humane use of the Atomic Bomb in WW2”. Best conservative estimates at the time indicated that a physical invasion of Japan by the USA would have resulted in one and one half million US casualties and a minimum of 4 and 1/2 million Japanese. Based on the most conservative estimates I could find, using the bomb saved at least 5 and 1/2 Million people (and likely far more given the fanaticism of the Japanese at the time. Darn few Japanese were ever taken as POW’s, preferring to fight to the death). I had an Uncle who’d fought all across the Pacific (5 landings) and who was one of the troops being readied for the invasion in Operation Olympic scheduled for November of 1945. He spoke of the reaction he and his buddies had when word of the A bomb came out “We wouldn’t have cared if they sank the whole dam-ed island”. Those who like to play armchair quarterback 80 years after the fact need to get an understanding of what the world was Actually like at the time.
 
And he should be strung up for it….will you say the same if trump on there? Direct question
Yes
I would.
I’m a Trunp voter.
Trump, clinton, obama, nixon, Kennedy, Bush, on and on and on…

They have to be proven first, and as you know, political figures go scott free. Look at the rat Hillary, that is a prime example.

Gone are the days a President will even be arrested or sent to jail.
That was proven by Nixon
 
OP’s thread entitled “RUSSIAN COLLUSION HOAX” appears to be about a conspiracy to undermine a presidency and the will of the people who elected him. By its nature, it threw out diplomacy and disrupted the goodwill between nations to the point where fear mongering and threats became the order of the day. Wars were started, economies destoyed and countries once again put the potential use of nuclear weapons on the table. Our tax dollars, yours and mine could have been put to better use IMO. Tulsi made some serious accusations here. If they are true, the people involved have brought this great nation to the brink of tyranny. The fact that there is a two-tiered justice system doesn’t make it less relevant.
 
1754234843019.jpeg
 
Trump is the biggest RINO of them all; every—EVERY core Republican philosophy he makes a mockery of.
Better than Biden, Clinton and Obama combined.
What got me is Obama had a platform to unite the African American and so called white privlege, and he just drove a wedge deeper, but I digress. Guess modern Presidents just drive wedges
 
Yes
I would.
I’m a Trunp voter.
Trump, clinton, obama, nixon, Kennedy, Bush, on and on and on…

They have to be proven first, and as you know, political figures go scott free. Look at the rat Hillary, that is a prime example.

Gone are the days a President will even be arrested or sent to jail.
That was proven by Nixon
100%

And to be clear, I figure majority of people would want to stone anyone that was found to be messin with kids. Even in prison they are the lowest of the low.
 
Better than Biden, Clinton and Obama combined.
What got me is Obama had a platform to unite the African American and so called white privlege, and he just drove a wedge deeper, but I digress. Guess modern Presidents just drive wedges
Methinks ‘‘tis the old “Divide and Conquer” thing. If the people of this nation ever got together and said “No” to this BS it’d end and there would be a bunch of unemployed politicians and political hacks . Can’t let That happen😏
 
Methinks ‘‘tis the old “Divide and Conquer” thing. If the people of this nation ever got together and said “No” to this BS it’d end and there would be a bunch of unemployed politicians and political hacks . Can’t let That happen😏
You mean as long as the people on right and left are busying arguing they aren’t paying attention to the fact politicians on both sides are f’ing them over 😉
 
Back
Top