testtest

Is It Bad to Store Magazines Fully Loaded?

Had a friend growing up whose father had his father's 1911 magazines loaded since WWII (7 rounders).

We shot them in the mid-80s, so 40+ years later they worked just fine.

I don't leave anything loaded longer than a few months....as I change my mags when the time changes each year, so twice a year I'm rotating. But I also have some mags that are still in factory bags.
 
No, what weakens magazines is constant loading unloading (aka shooting)

I would worry more about weather changes k we time to my ammo tjan the magazine failing. Going from hot humid to A/C or sub zero cold to heated house or via versa over the course of a time

Here is what I do I have designated duty mags (usually 3) that whem I get the new I shoot a couple mags worth to check for functionality kid them with duty or social ammo and the stay loaded I don’t train with them I don’t practice with them or anything.

I will again function test usually annually whem I swap out ammo and usually rotate them to the training mag group after 2/3 years or so.

I have used mags that I use somet for training quals and classes that I don’t care if they get dropped in concrete we trained in whatever

Now o would have no issues picking up a mag that’s been fully loaded for several years that has been in a climate controlled area and running it. Again usually the ammo will deteriorate due to atmospheric reasons before a mag will (if a quality mag is used)
 
This discussion has been all over the Internet for years. One of the times that it came up I don't remember if somebody else referenced this physics forum or I found it myself. But I went to it and they had article after article after article about spring set and over compression and scragging ( scragging is when you buy Springs that are just a little bit longer than the application calls for and the first time that you put the springs under full load they take What's called "A Set" and they compress to whatever length you wanted them to be.

Here is a link to the Forum



I assume most magazine manufacturers order their springs just a little long to "allow for set". For example the M&P Shield magazines that are initially so hard to load. Once the owner loads the magazine the first time the springs take that "initial set" and after that even compressed solid they don't approach the compression limit.

The following was originally posted on THR several years ago by a poster named "Walt Sherrill" . I have no idea if that was his real name or not but he was considered to be an SME on the topic of metallurgy and spring design.

Walt's Response
OVERFLEXING is the key. Most 1911 magazinesprings will have a long life, and the 7-round mag springs (like those in the WWII mags that were kept loaded) will have the longest life.

According to the experts, including Metallurgists (the engineers who work with and design metals) and others who use springs in aviation, auto, and space applications, flexing/working a spring will have little effect on it's working life unless, as it's compressed, the spring nears or exceeds the springs "elastic limit." (The "elastic limit" is the amount of compression a coil spring experience until it's damaged. Most guns springs (like tappet springs in cars) are designed and used in ways that don't approach that limit. The exception? A lot of very high-cap mags, recoil springs in sub-compact guns, some sub-compact mag springs, etc. In those more-specialized cases, the gun designers consider the springs "renewable resources" and spring life is sacrificed for additional rounds or function performed in a smaller space. When a spring's elastic limit is exceeded, the spring's metal begins to suffer from micro-fractures, and as the spring is used, the amount fracturing continues -- until the springsoftens and doesn't function properly. None of this has much to do with the HEAT generated by flexing, but simply has to do with how the steel's structure responds to the amount of flexing/stretching it experiences. Steel is a very resilient material. Aluminum, on the other hand, isn't -- which is why we don't see aluminum used in springs.)

The Rohrbaugh R9 had a recommended recoil spring life of about 250 rounds/cycles. (It had originally been about 100 rounds higher, but they lowered the round count after the gun had been out for a while. The springs weren't that expensive.). The springs might still work after 250 round, but folks didn't want to RISK a failure or poor functionality (like the inability to chamber the next round when used as a carry weapon.)
The R9 recoil spring was a very small springstuffed into a very small frame and slide, yet it had to still cycle a 9mm round, stripping a 9mm round from a mag and chambering it. That springdidn't last as long as a full-size spring in a full-size gun firing the same number of rounds.)

With most full-size guns, leaving the mag loaded might not make a difference. For some very high-cap mags, leaving them loaded might shorten mag spring life. If cycling springs alone wore them out, many cars with tappets wouldn't be running -- as those springs cycle many millions of times over a car engine's life. Note: Wolff Springs (in the FAQ area of their website) suggests, for hi-cap mags, that the owner download the spring a round or two during storage -- they say they'll last longer if you do. As noted above, however, not all mag designs require that.

Personally, I don't store magazines fully loaded except for in my carry gun and I rotate those every year.
 
Depends on the magazine..........

Let me elaborate.........

Take the Holy MAGPUL........
Thier 20, and 30 round 556 magazines are great.
However, thier 40 round 556, and 20 round LR308 magazines are NOT up to par. Storing them loaded expands the feed lips so far apart they will misfeed when you slap them home in a mag well.
I even wrote MAGPUL and told them, the reply I got was Crickets........
Now the ONLY LR308 MAGPUL magazine I own is the 10 round one. I cashiered every single one, to include the sole 40 round 556 magazine that had the same issue.
I'll gladly stick with thier 20, and 30 round magazines, but there are other, much better options to fill in for MAGPUL.
 
Depends on the magazine..........

Let me elaborate.........

Take the Holy MAGPUL........
Thier 20, and 30 round 556 magazines are great.
However, thier 40 round 556, and 20 round LR308 magazines are NOT up to par. Storing them loaded expands the feed lips so far apart they will misfeed when you slap them home in a mag well.
I even wrote MAGPUL and told them, the reply I got was Crickets........
Now the ONLY LR308 MAGPUL magazine I own is the 10 round one. I cashiered every single one, to include the sole 40 round 556 magazine that had the same issue.
I'll gladly stick with thier 20, and 30 round magazines, but there are other, much better options to fill in for MAGPUL.
I have three or four of the MagPul 40 poppers and a couple of the D60 drums. They're the only mags I DON'T keep loaded. They are primarily range toys and props to pull out and flaunt in front of libtards who need a good strong fright.
 
Back
Top