testtest

Flock cameras at gun ranges

Pitdogg2 said:
I look at it this way. Most of us on here disagree with the pretext of these cameras. We're not fighting them for today per say, we're fighting them for our grandkids forward. Just imagine what our country would look like today if the early pioneers would not fought back against the tax put on us from Great Britain. We as a country would be far different than we are today. I don't want the country to be that far different going forward to where we've turned into East Germany or worse North Korea.
We have to stay vigilant.
Click to expand...
If you want to see, watch this series on Amazon…though I watched all the seasons as they were originally broadcasting, it was certainly prophetic. Towards the end, there are some out of control AI scenarios as well…more prophecy!

Person of Interest

1786734076704.gif
 
HayesGreener said:
Officers typically canvas areas where crimes have occurred to get permission from owners of surveillance cameras to access video. If data goes to the cloud I am pretty sure you would need a warrant if the owner doesn't give it up.
Click to expand...
Based on what ring camera you own the purchase of the Ring camera gives permission to law enforcement to access your video with or without your consent. This was an agreement entered into by Ring. Older Gen 1 cameras are not part of the deal.
 
Flock camera data is already being abused by police. Several instances of LEO's tracking their exes, illegally, and getting caught. Time to join the blade runners. I despise the concept of, "if you're not doing anything wrong..."
 
Old_Me said:
that's always been an issue...over crowding jails and prisons and detention centers....too many criminals, too few beds.

i always say if you cannot build wide...??

then build up, as in a hi-rise building.

way lots of state lands everywhere, to build....

too many NIMBY's fighting prison building.
Click to expand...
Frankly if the truly bad actors were eliminated, as were those on their third “tour” there would BE a lot more room in jails. There is a small percentage (1%?) of humans who are predatory animals, period. Get rid of those and crime basically disappears. Nobody has any business monitoring anyone with the sole exception of law enforcement monitoring thugs.
 
Shibadog said:
Frankly if the truly bad actors were eliminated, as were those on their third “tour” there would BE a lot more room in jails. There is a small percentage (1%?) of humans who are predatory animals, period. Get rid of those and crime basically disappears. Nobody has any business monitoring anyone with the sole exception of law enforcement monitoring thugs.
Click to expand...
i have always been..."pro-death penalty"

does the condemned at least deserve 1 appeal..??

yes, but if still found guilty, then carry out the sentence ASAP..

if not for the state tax payers who are footing the bill for his/her housing, food, medical care, but to "just carry out the deserved justice"

but as we all know, the bleeding hearts will continue to fight for them......

again, even though a "different set of circumstances"...

the state of MD rep who, who went to another country, "rescue" the high ranking gang member this past spring........

when we rid our country of such an asinine, moronic representation, maybe then, crime stats, jail times, and the death penalty will actually serve us well.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top