Search results

SHhhh We don't have to do that anymore. We got a card when i passed the background check and they check my address (as if someone from Texas would come to California to pay 20% in already inflated prices). We just pay an extra 11% firearm tax instead. I have an out of state relative that buys...

This is newsome we're talking about. He'll just make up some BS to make himself look good. It'll have nothing to do with his new barrel tax.

They cut down on fumes by making us spill gas every time we use the can. And it's the same with gasoline

I can't wait for them to tell us what a difference it made

I just bought four tires for our pickup. They cost more than my first brand new car did

Of you're jousting on your motorcycle, make sure your helmet has a DOT sticker on it.

Because they hurt and it's not illegal to conceal. You're right. California does not allow shipment of chemical irritants. Other states don't also. And, yeah, the Byrna is probably bigger than my Hellcat. I know it's bigger than my wife's mini-revolver. Maybe it won't make a hole as big as my...

Byrna CO2. Not a firearm. Concealable in 50 states, apparently.

Nope. I have a couple concerns about the not-old days. The people in the private sector have better access to camera networks than most public agencies and are not bound in how they use it. And access to this technology is not only available and provided here, it is shared world-wide. We have...

It's starting to make brick-and-mortar stores more convenient.

I was speaking figuratively. But even then, i wasn't thinking that way.

She figures if she bans his penis, he won't want to have sex anymore. Not with her, anyway.

Sure. But catching a murderer after it happened doesn't stop the killing. It might not even put him in prison.

If we are headed the way of accepting cameras everywhere, we should just give up ? Where will it stop ? We should just accept it ? Does that make sense ? The parallel of just accepting the way things are going would also apply to the growing trend of gun restrictions, too, wouldn't it ?

This restoration of gun rights would end up being a case-by-case decision, and we do not have the capability to widely judge this consistently. We obviously don't have a level playing field. We can't even prosecute cases consistently

I was right along with you until that lasr sentence. A camera tells you what happened AFTER it happened. When seconds count, help is only fifteen minutes away, and you'll have a picture of it tomorrow.

The price of shipping is what's gonna kill ya. The ammo, now that i think about, could too

They could mediate the problem by requiring revolvers to have only ten-round magazines. Historically, it always takes just one more firearm law to fix these issues. That way, they can say they did something to 'fight Big Ammo' at the next election.

Yep. The pink ones are the safest @

I get it, but I kinda wish someone had had an AR-15 when the guy that shot Charlie Kirk was aiming at him