testtest

Father fatally shooting illegal immigrant attempting to carjack family of 8

TurboDog910

Custom
I believe we counted 10-11 shots. He is justified but I think he is pushing his luck with 10-11 shots to neutralize the threat.
If the criminal was jacked up on something perhaps it took that many.
🤷‍♂️
What do you folks think?
Glad he was able to protect his family.
 
I believe we counted 10-11 shots. He is justified but I think he is pushing his luck with 10-11 shots to neutralize the threat.
If the criminal was jacked up on something perhaps it took that many.
🤷‍♂️
What do you folks think?
Glad he was able to protect his family.
Keep pulling the trigger until the threat stops moving. That includes twitches.
 
Based on the amount of rounds in the ceilings of indoor ranges and the amount of rounds LEO’s send into perps, round count has zero bearing on stopping a threat.

Did the Police who stopped the school shooter count rounds ?
Did the crew that killed Bin Laden count rounds ??

Round count has no bearing on stopping a threat
 
Respectfully to some that are
Tough talkers. I bet the tone changes when the gavel comes down. Ask LAPD Officer Toni McBride she shot a suspect with a knife 6 times. The review bird said she was good with the first four but the last 2 that she was not. This she has been fighting the case off and in since 2020.

It do whatever your career and bank account can handle

 
Respectfully to some that are
Tough talkers. I bet the tone changes when the gavel comes down. Ask LAPD Officer Toni McBride she shot a suspect with a knife 6 times. The review bird said she was good with the first four but the last 2 that she was not. This she has been fighting the case off and in since 2020.

It do whatever your career and bank account can handle

While I respect your opinion, I'd much rather be judged by 12 than carried by 6.
 
Respectfully to some that are
Tough talkers. I bet the tone changes when the gavel comes down. Ask LAPD Officer Toni McBride she shot a suspect with a knife 6 times. The review bird said she was good with the first four but the last 2 that she was not. This she has been fighting the case off and in since 2020.

It do whatever your career and bank account can handle

When you engage in a gunfight, do you think in your head I’ll only shoot twice, maybe 4. Oh this perp will take only 3 rounds.
Horseđź’©.
You engage at the time with what will stop a threat. It may be 2 or it may be 10. No situation will ever be the same. A judge nor jury can apply a standard.
The lapd leo you describe is a situation of a poor judicial system. Just like those judges who try to apply their beliefs rarher than impartial judgement.

Ask yourself mr non tough talker, how many rounds do you need to stop the threat ?
 
When you engage in a gunfight, do you think in your head I’ll only shoot twice, maybe 4. Oh this perp will take only 3 rounds.
Horseđź’©.
You engage at the time with what will stop a threat. It may be 2 or it may be 10. No situation will ever be the same. A judge nor jury can apply a standard.
The lapd leo you describe is a situation of a poor judicial system. Just like those judges who try to apply their beliefs rarher than impartial judgement.

Ask yourself mr non tough talker, how many rounds do you need to stop the threat ?
And more importantly, how many licks does it take to get to the center of a tootsie pop? 🤪
 
Deadly force that is justified is justified deadly force, whether one or 15 rounds. You shoot till thevthreat ends. But, with an assailant who is down and clearly no longer poses a threat, additional shots can cross the line from self defense to execution. A pharmacist in Oklahoma is serving a life sentence for this very thing. But looking at this video I see nothing like that.
 
Last edited:
Based on the amount of rounds in the ceilings of indoor ranges and the amount of rounds LEO’s send into perps, round count has zero bearing on stopping a threat.

Did the Police who stopped the school shooter count rounds ?
Did the crew that killed Bin Laden count rounds ??

Round count has no bearing on stopping a threat
although we all know the lawyers will say it was "way too much, and the end result was to kill, NOT stopping any threat"

i believe the father HAD to right to defend his family however, but you knw he will still get raked over the coals in court, come time that thugs family goes to sue him.
 
When you engage in a gunfight, do you think in your head I’ll only shoot twice, maybe 4. Oh this perp will take only 3 rounds.
Horseđź’©.
You engage at the time with what will stop a threat. It may be 2 or it may be 10. No situation will ever be the same. A judge nor jury can apply a standard.
The lapd leo you describe is a situation of a poor judicial system. Just like those judges who try to apply their beliefs rarher than impartial judgement.

Ask yourself mr non tough talker, how many rounds do you need to stop the threat ?


I have been in scene at a few shootjng, I have also been involved in some form of LE for 40 years to include training. Bear with me as this all rolls over to normal earth people when they use force

We are (or should be) long gone from the bad SOP of “shoot til the threat goes away”

I am also not suggesting shoot 2 and assess. However assessment IS a large part of it.

While the link of our of LAPD the Tori McBride case is a great example of the type of scrutiny one will face.

LAPD does have a great teainjng program and for SWAT (LAPD is one of the best) to line Officers is a .50 (half seconds) splits. It’s more than fast enough to hammer a perp
With effective hits over and iver (where the rounds are landed where they do what they need to)

Any shooting whem an LEao shoots more than 7 rounds or faster than .38 it ends I. A mag dump and maybe an elbow hit. The .40-.50 and under 6 rounds is usually an effective stop by the LEO.

John Hearn (who I have trained under and have AI’d for) has a top notch Cognative Handgun with Tactocal Anatomy course that any agency worth theor weight uses.

Any private citizen would be well advised to seek it or other relevent training iyt as it will A helo hih end any fight uiu get in and B minimize bad things that happen woth mag Dino’s.
 
1778152582456.png
 
It is always best to avoid a shooting situation, but if it becomes necessary as is the case here, there is no formula for the number of shots. Use of deadly force cases are judged with the reasonable person standard. What would a reasonable person believe is reasonable and necessary in a specific set of circumstances? And every situation has its own set of circumstances.
 
I have been in scene at a few shootjng, I have also been involved in some form of LE for 40 years to include training. Bear with me as this all rolls over to normal earth people when they use force

We are (or should be) long gone from the bad SOP of “shoot til the threat goes away”

I am also not suggesting shoot 2 and assess. However assessment IS a large part of it.

While the link of our of LAPD the Tori McBride case is a great example of the type of scrutiny one will face.

LAPD does have a great teainjng program and for SWAT (LAPD is one of the best) to line Officers is a .50 (half seconds) splits. It’s more than fast enough to hammer a perp
With effective hits over and iver (where the rounds are landed where they do what they need to)

Any shooting whem an LEao shoots more than 7 rounds or faster than .38 it ends I. A mag dump and maybe an elbow hit. The .40-.50 and under 6 rounds is usually an effective stop by the LEO.

John Hearn (who I have trained under and have AI’d for) has a top notch Cognative Handgun with Tactocal Anatomy course that any agency worth theor weight uses.

Any private citizen would be well advised to seek it or other relevent training iyt as it will A helo hih end any fight uiu get in and B minimize bad things that happen woth mag Dino’s.
I dont disagree.
What I have issue with is the “number of rounds” it takes to drop an assailant. There is no correct answer for this even with the most highly trained persons. Every situation and environment of the shooting is different. Were they in a car?
10 yards away or 10 feet away? Etc. Etc..
 
Deadly force that is justified is justified deadly force, whether one or 15 rounds. You shoot till thevthreat ends. But, with an assailant who is down and clearly no longer poses a threat, additional shots can cross the line from self defense to execution. A pharmacist in Oklahoma is serving a life sentence for this very thing. But looking at this video I see nothing like that.
This. Every situation is different;
Nobody wants to be on trial but you do have to live to be put on trial. Just be prepared for the scrutiny you may face.
 
Back
Top