I never had a problem with the M&P Shield 1.0, Shield 2.0, and the new Shield Plus triggers. I have a 4" M&P 2.0 with the hinge trigger, and I shoot that one just fine as well. They didn't get where they are now, sell several million, and have been one of the most popular and sold platform in the last decade+ because the trigger sucked and no one could hit the broad side of the barn with them...
I never been much of a trigger snob. Never had a problem hitting what I'm aiming at with a typical standard duty grade, ~6lb, short and light take up, short reset striker-fired triggers whether it be Glock, S&W M&P, Springfield XD/Hellcat, HK's, Berettas, CZ's, etc.... I primarily EDA long, heavy, DAO revolvers more than anything else. DA/SA is my preference when it comes to semiautos. Basically, the striker-fired triggers some complain about seem like a walk in the park to me.
I never understood the modern day requirement to need a competition or target trigger on a defensive handgun. Dry firing, learning the trigger on the particular firearm/platform, practice, and fundamentals should get even a moderate skilled shooter consistent and repeat hits on target center mass at defensive distances.
Back on topic, the M&P 2.0 series new and old, the Springfield XD and XDM series, and basically all modern striker-fired pistols have good capable triggers if the person manipulating does their part. They all are good reliable platforms sans P320. It all comes down to personal preference, and strangers online can only tell you what flavor ice cream they like the best, but that doesn't necessarily mean it's what you'll like the best.