Ok, just for background I live in the country, nearest neighbor is a few hundred yards away. Second, I’m well on my 75th trip around the sun and started shooting and hunting 68 years ago, so I’m not new to firearms. So yesterday I’m in the local toy shop seeing what they have that I can’t live without

. There on the rack is an AR 9mm carbine, complete with optical sight, vertical foregrip and flashlight. Two young bucks are ‘oohing” and “aahhing” and generally drooling all over this thing. I picked it up and the darn thing has got to weigh 7.5 or 8 lbs

. They also haa Henry Homestreader in 9, also a fairly chunky monkey ( though a good bit lighter than the AR). Also on the rack was an AR15A2, a mini 14, a mini 30, an M1 .30 carbine (original Inland) and a 45/70 guide gun, ALL of which are lighter swing faster, are similar in size AND pack between 3 and 9 times the power of the 9mm. If you want/need a rifle, why would you not want rifle power? I know 9 is cheap to shoot, but 9 even from a 16.5 tube is a pretty weak sister even compared to a little .223, much less to a serious rifle cartridge. I know I’m not one of the Kewl Kids, and I’ve no interest in playing Rambo and doing mag dumps. but If I need a rifle, then I WANT a Rifle. Frankly I’d take the M1, the GuideGun or any of the others WAY before I’d grab any 9 mm “Rifle”. So, other than a range toy, why a 9mm rifle? Must be a reason but I sure don’t get it. For a SD firearm, or even a gun for around the farm for varmint control why would you want less power, less range and at an distance less accuracy?
So needing a rifle? I appreciate shooting long distances. I do. For that you probably do need a rifle, not a pistol caliber carbine. However, when shooting a 9mm round from a 16-inch barrel, the power and velocity of the bullet can be significantly higher than when fired from a shorter barrel. Generally, a standard 9mm round fired from a typical 4 to 5-inch barrel achieves a velocity of around 1,100 to 1,200 feet per second (fps).
With a 16-inch barrel, you can expect the velocity to increase, potentially reaching around 1,300 to 1,400 fps, depending on the specific load and bullet type. This increase in barrel length allows for more complete combustion of the powder, resulting in higher velocity and energy.
In terms of energy, the kinetic energy of a bullet can be calculated using the formula:
Kinetic Energy (KE)=21mv2
where m is the mass of the bullet in kilograms and v is the velocity in meters per second. A typical 9mm bullet weighs about 7.45 grams (0.00745 kg).
For example, if we take a velocity of 1,350 fps (approximately 411 meters per second), the kinetic energy would be:
KE=21×0.00745kg×(411m/s)2≈0.5×0.00745×168921≈0.629J
This results in approximately 629 Joules of energy, which is significantly higher than the energy produced from a shorter barrel.
For anything I am going to do, a PCC would be more than adequate. I'm not going to hunt with it (I have revolvers for that

). On duty or off I tend to base a lot of my choices on police stats. So.................
Police shootouts often vary significantly in terms of distance, and studies have shown that the majority of these engagements occur at relatively close ranges.
Key points regarding the distances involved in police shootouts:
- Close Range Engagements: A significant percentage of police shootings occur at distances of 0 to 10 feet. This range often includes situations where officers are responding to immediate threats or engaging in close-quarters confrontations.
- Short Range (10 to 25 yards): Many police shootouts happen within 10 to 25 yards. This range is common in urban environments where encounters can occur in confined spaces, such as alleys or buildings.
- Medium Range (25 to 50 yards): Engagements at this distance are less common but still significant. Officers may find themselves in situations where they need to engage suspects from a distance, such as during a pursuit or when responding to a barricaded subject.
- Long Range (50 yards and beyond): Shootouts at distances greater than 50 yards are relatively rare. These situations may occur in open areas or during specific tactical operations, but they represent a smaller percentage of overall police shooting incidents.
Percentages by Distance:
While exact percentages can vary by study and region, a general breakdown based on various analyses of police shooting incidents looks kind of like this:
- 0 to 10 feet: Approximately 30-40%
- 10 to 25 yards: Approximately 30-40%
- 25 to 50 yards: Approximately 15-20%
- 50 yards and beyond: Approximately 5-10%
- Factors Influencing Engagement Distance
Several factors can influence the distance of police shootouts, including:
- Environment: Urban vs. rural settings can affect how close officers and suspects are when engagements occur.
- Nature of the Incident: High-risk situations, such as active shooter scenarios or armed confrontations, may dictate the distance at which officers engage.
- Tactics and Training: Police training and tactics can also play a role in how officers approach and engage suspects.
So at the end of the day. My duty long gun is currently a 5.56 caliber AR-15 rifle. If someone comes out with a PCC that acceptes Glock 43x/48 mags. I will probably work on getting it accepted as duty long gun. Fast, light and not having one less thing to worry about (different mags in this case). Increased accuracy. More power. Even I couldn't get it for a duty carbine it would make an excellent trunk gun for road trips. Ideally I would probably try for a AR-9 pistol as a 10.5" barrel would be best based off of powder burn efficiency.
That will lead into this segue involving shorter barrels. This is something that is easier to accomplish. With a pistol caliber you still get better performance and you don't have to worry about buffer and spring rate changes affecting cycling. Since I have an AR-9 I'm just 9mm as my primary example of why you might want a AR platform pistol in a pistol caliber.
Burn Rate: The type of powder used in 9mm ammunition is designed to burn efficiently within a certain range of barrel lengths. A 10.5-inch barrel allows for more complete combustion of the powder compared to shorter barrels (e.g., 4-5 inches), which lead to the higher velocities.
Velocity Increase: As mentioned, a longer barrel typically results in higher muzzle velocities. The increase in velocity from a 10.5-inch barrel reach that 1,300 to 1,400 fps speed; depending on the load.
Optimal Barrel Length: While 9mm cartridges can achieve good performance in barrels as short as 4 inches, the 10.5-inch barrel provides a balance between compactness and performance. It allows for a more complete burn of the powder, maximizing the energy transferred to the bullet.
Comparison to Longer Barrels
Diminishing Returns: While longer barrels (e.g., 16 inches) can provide even higher velocities, the increase in performance becomes less pronounced after a certain point. The 10.5-inch barrel is often seen as a sweet spot for maximizing performance without significantly increasing the overall length and weight of the firearm.
Here is where it would really pay off and I would just pay the stamp and get an SBR. A 10.5-inch barrel is still compact enough for maneuverability in close quarters, making it better in tactical applications (active shooter, warrant service, anything dynamic that gives me the two minutes to grab it and my armor

) while still providing the mentioned benefits of a longer barrel.
So in conclusion this is why someone might want a pistol caliber carbine in: .380 (yup, for reals .380 ACP), 9mm, .38/.357 mag, .40, 10mm, .45 ACP, .45 Colt, .454 Casull, and probably a few more (especially in a pistol or SBR format).
a 10.5-inch barrel is sufficient to ensure that most of the powder in a 9mm cartridge is burned, leading to increased maximum velocity and energy. This barrel length strikes a good balance between performance and practicality. Also, shooting a 9mm anything in doors tend to cause much less hearing damage. Anyone who has shot a 5.56 AR-15 (especially in a pistol format) will tell you the same. If you go the SBR route, might as well get a can and 9mm suppresses better than a rifle.
In addition I don't own a farm. I actually don't think that I know any legitimate farmers. I don't know what kind of threats you are going to run into on a farm. I live in the hills, outside of a city. I don't have very many neighbors and even then they are a ways away. I haven't seen a varmint here. My biggest threat is rattlesnakes, maybe a mountain lion or a very lost burglar. So, unless I am litterally under fire or there is something else dynamically exigent going down that puts an active threat beyond 75-100 yards (I've shot my AR-9 and my .40 cal. Ruger PC Carbine at 100 yards just to see). My light weight, very manueverable pistol caliber long guns are great (I will add my Rossi R92 among this).
This is my .02¢ only.