Hello all, here is today's article posted on TheArmoryLife.com. It is titled “Is Defensive Firearms Training Defensible?” and can be found at https://www.thearmorylife.com/firearms-training-in-court/.


Decisively declared!downright definitely demonstratable defensive defensible.![]()
Something about this reminds me of that gun range scene in the first Men in Black movie. Little Tiffany was suspiciousThe video that @KillerFord1977 has of me gunning down a couple of civilian targets so I could get to the bad guy might not help my case. The instructor said I shot a Mom and her daughter out shopping. I told him I was pretty sure they were MS13.
What a fun career! 10 years of road time and 20+ prosecuting -you're a veritable unicorn! I worked for a D.A's office with about 130 attorneys (at the time) and did the backgrounds on many new hires. Some of them came in with all the life experience of Little Bo Peep!Ayoob hits the mark, as usual. Training has application beyond trial. When you claim self defense, the investigating officer should be asking you what you know about self defense. With the assistance of your attorney or legal team (you shouldn't be talking to the police without and attorney), your training records can be produced and document the training you've actually had. Now, training is not essential to a winning claim of self defense, but it gets you a lot further down field if you can show you received quality training and you followed that training. My opinion is based upon 10 years as a police officer, 2 years as a criminal defense attorney, 3 years representing a larger Alaska police department, and 20+ years as a prosecutor. As a prosecutor I certainly wanted to know what training a person had and whether they followed the training. You can never go wrong with quality training.
“APPLIED” knowledge is power.Knowledge is power. The more you know, the more you are trained,the better you are.
Better than North Korea, Russia and China, wont you say ?the legal system is garbage
Ayoob hits the mark, as usual. Training has application beyond trial. When you claim self defense, the investigating officer should be asking you what you know about self defense. With the assistance of your attorney or legal team (you shouldn't be talking to the police without and attorney), your training records can be produced and document the training you've actually had. Now, training is not essential to a winning claim of self defense, but it gets you a lot further down field if you can show you received quality training and you followed that training. My opinion is based upon 10 years as a police officer, 2 years as a criminal defense attorney, 3 years representing a larger Alaska police department, and 20+ years as a prosecutor. As a prosecutor I certainly wanted to know what training a person had and whether they followed the training. You can never go wrong with quality training.
So true as I saw several of those during my last years as a training officer for security teams. They had plenty of paper but very little hands on.“APPLIED” knowledge is power.
You can have a ton of knowledge, but you have to know how to utilize it.![]()
A founding member with a few posts... i heard AK people are a bit out there...Hello!
And welcome to the forum.
I hope you visit often to share your experience and expertise.
I would like it if my self defense training was tax deductible.
Thank you for your indulgence,
BassCliff
A founding member with a few posts... i heard AK people are a bit out there...