testtest

Justice Department Sues the City of Denver for Unconstitutional Weapons Bans

shanneba

shanneba

Professional
Today, the Justice Department filed suit against the City of Denver, Colorado alleging that the City unconstitutionally bans certain constitutionally protected semi-automatic rifles. These laws unconstitutionally infringe on the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens to keep and bear arms in common use for lawful purposes.

As the complaint explains, the City enforces an ordinance that makes it a crime to possess so-called “assault weapons.” But that the City’s ban includes AR-15-style rifles, which are the most popular rifles in America. Law-abiding Americans own tens of millions of rifles like those banned by the City.

www.justice.gov

Justice Department Sues the City of Denver for Unconstitutional Weapons Bans

Today, the Justice Department filed suit against the City of Denver, Colorado alleging that the City unconstitutionally bans certain constitutionally protected semi-automatic rifles. These laws unconstitutionally infringe on the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens to keep and bear...
www.justice.gov www.justice.gov
 
shanneba said:
Today, the Justice Department filed suit against the City of Denver, Colorado alleging that the City unconstitutionally bans certain constitutionally protected semi-automatic rifles. These laws unconstitutionally infringe on the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens to keep and bear arms in common use for lawful purposes.

As the complaint explains, the City enforces an ordinance that makes it a crime to possess so-called “assault weapons.” But that the City’s ban includes AR-15-style rifles, which are the most popular rifles in America. Law-abiding Americans own tens of millions of rifles like those banned by the City.

www.justice.gov

Justice Department Sues the City of Denver for Unconstitutional Weapons Bans

Today, the Justice Department filed suit against the City of Denver, Colorado alleging that the City unconstitutionally bans certain constitutionally protected semi-automatic rifles. These laws unconstitutionally infringe on the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens to keep and bear...
www.justice.gov www.justice.gov
Click to expand...
Another example of cities and states enacting law's that infringe. Then they just enforce that law for years while it
goes through the court systems until it is finally settled one way or the other...even if they lose the law suit they have
years to enforce a law that should have never been passed to start with.
 
If they get sued and have to pay real damages, that is the only way it will stop. Unless they pass a law that says "If you propose a law that is later found Unconstitutional you give up your gravy train position and are further barred from all public office or benefits associated with that position". Then, and only then will politicians start to follow the Constitution.
 
Winchester67 said:
If they get sued and have to pay real damages, that is the only way it will stop. Unless they pass a law that says "If you propose a law that is later found Unconstitutional you give up your gravy train position and are further barred from all public office or benefits associated with that position". Then, and only then will politicians start to follow the Constitution.
Click to expand...
Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241 - Conspiracy Against Rights
Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242 - Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law
Title 18, U.S.C., Section 245 - Federally Protected Activities

We don't need new laws. The DOJ needs to push the laws we already have.
 
If one can read between the lines then he or she can see the handwriting on the wall. Momentum is building to short circuit court decisions by amending the Constitution. I’m sure the 2nd Amendment will be the first to go should Progressives gain control of both houses.

share.google

‘60 Minutes’ Sends Pointed Message in Final Moments of Show

The program invited a historian to ask a pertinent question about the state of American democracy.
share.google share.google
 
When a state issues a drivers license it is recognized in all 50 states, even though each state has different requirements for that license. A marriage license issued in one state still applies in every other state. If you are found guilty of perjury in one state and are called to testify in another, the state must make your history of perjury known to the defense because you were convicted in another US court BUT somehow a CCW permit is NOT recognized in all 50 states Some how gun laws dont receive the same respect from state to state
 
PieterCoetzee said:
When a state issues a drivers license it is recognized in all 50 states, even though each state has different requirements for that license. A marriage license issued in one state still applies in every other state. If you are found guilty of perjury in one state and are called to testify in another, the state must make your history of perjury known to the defense because you were convicted in another US court BUT somehow a CCW permit is NOT recognized in all 50 states Some how gun laws dont receive the same respect from state to state
Click to expand...
you finally got something many can agree upon
 
I watched the 60 minutes segment live. It pretty much laid out the battlefield plan.
If we thought the Biden years were bad, I'm afraid it may seem super tame by comparison.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top