testtest

Meet the new Glock, same as the old Glock





Like I said in a previous thread, Glock was only the beginning……..total ban on all guns is there ultimate goal….
I don’t think the Ruger could even share a backplate, pretty sure that is unique. The FCI is also unique on its own.
 
I'm happy with my 2 Gen3 , and Gen4 (and a quasi clone ) . IF l had a desire for something else in that neighborhood , probably a .45acp Shield .

**********************

Glock , the company , isn't making any windfall . It's the dealers and distributors who had some in stock at the time who are practicing Capitalism 101 , supply vs demand , and Willing Buyers ultimately setting the prices .


BUT , seeing the initial V Models , it's obvious it wasn't a normally thought out & developed product line roll out . It's obvious it's a hasty panic stop gap , and politically driven .

Glock managenent had free will to make decisions . But this isn't just effecting them . They're emboldening the " get rid of all guns " element , and de facto throwing the entire gun industry under the bus .

Hence * to me * , l will now treat the Glock Company , the same way l did the Hillary Era Smith & Wesson .
 
“That guy” on every internet gun forum right now

IMG_1552.jpeg
 


Additional links…..
Wasn’t everyone mad and calling for a boycot on Ruger in 1993 over Bill Ruger SR comments on 10 round mags? Why year they did,

Didn’t they complain at S&W in 1999 yes

Rock River and Springfield 2018 ish yes

Gkick and Ruger will do what they do like S&W like RR yada yada

And people will still buy them. they are not going anywhere
 
Last edited:
Wasn’t everyone mad and calling for a boycot on Ruger in 1993 over Bill Ruger SR comments on 10 round mags? Why year they did,

Didn’t they complain at S&W in 1999 yes

Rock River and Springfield 2018 ish yes

Gkick and Ruger will do what they do like S&W like RR yada yada

And people will still buy them. they are not going anywhere
I was just posting that now there going after Ruger…..nothing more…..don’t know where or why you came up with all this rhetoric
it has nothing to do with this post
 
I was just posting that now there going after Ruger…..nothing more…..don’t know where or why you came up with all this rhetoric
it has nothing to do with this post

It’s comparable. There is a histoey of people getting mad and calling for boycott whem a gun conpany does what companies do time to time.

And like this Gen V Glock thing folks are mad and accusing Glock of sleeping with the enemy just like they did Ruger 30 some years ago because Bull Ruger commented about “no honest man needs more than 10 round mags”
Just like they did S&W for doing the revolver lock

Rinse and repeat.
 
It’s comparable. There is a histoey of people getting mad and calling for boycott whem a gun conpany does what companies do time to time.

And like this Gen V Glock thing folks are mad and accusing Glock of sleeping with the enemy just like they did Ruger 30 some years ago because Bull Ruger commented about “no honest man needs more than 10 round mags”
Just like they did S&W for doing the revolver lock

Rinse and repeat.
Still has nothing to do with the links I posted, it’s about the left going after Ruger now, just like they did to Glock, it has nothing to do with people commenting about what Ruger, S&W did years ago…..nothing
 
I won't buy any V models mainly because i have enough of their other ones. these new ones may be perfectly fine. one thing about a Glock is they work and work well. granted i would have loved to see a different module. they should not change up there FCU and slide, just a better grip and could make some models with the new looks and some with the old looks. i doubt they ever will but if you truly need a gun that is reliable then a Glock fills that bill.
 
Back
Top