testtest

Shooting in Rhode Island

Rhode Island's gun laws in 2025 include a ban on the sale of certain military-style assault weapons, restrictions on large-capacity magazines, and requirements for safe storage of firearms. The state has also implemented universal background checks and raised the legal age to purchase firearms from 18 to 21, making its gun laws among the most comprehensive in the country.
 
Onewolf426 said:
Rhode Island's gun laws in 2025 include a ban on the sale of certain military-style assault weapons, restrictions on large-capacity magazines, and requirements for safe storage of firearms. The state has also implemented universal background checks and raised the legal age to purchase firearms from 18 to 21, making its gun laws among the most comprehensive in the country.
Click to expand...
That certainly worked .

( sarcasm)
 
somorris said:
I feel empathy for all the students who were told to “hide under their desks.” This incident is just so sad, I don’t have anything else much to say.
Click to expand...
we still do not know all the details, but i "suspect" the shooter isn't even from RI......

but we here in RI will suffer from even more gun control to full on banning

and it would not surprise me to maybe a ban for only 1 round magazines now.
 
Belt Fed said:
Some of the comments say it was a Jewish event, so a hate crime i would think.
Click to expand...
yeah, i had to go out just a while ago....just got back...its lightly but getting a bit heavier, snowing.

i had to get those lottery tickets

any way, an ironic twist, if it was a Jewish event..as Brown has been anti-Semitic..........

but if it was, maybe it was an event to mend ways with the Jewish community and students.


Brown University has faced significant scrutiny and federal investigations over antisemitism, with complaints citing harassment, threats, and the university's slow response, leading to a July 2024 settlement with the Department of Education for process improvements, while also dealing with broader campus tensions, including pro-Palestinian protests, disciplinary actions against groups like SJP, and ongoing climate issues for Jewish students
 
Old_Me said:
they (Brown) actually have a full police force, with FULL powers of the police

this is why i am an advocate of cameras EVERY WHERE
Click to expand...
I respectfully disagree. I think there are cameras in FAR TOO MANY places already. We're living in a dystopia where you can't go out in public without being recorded somewhere.

I prefer carrying firearms EVERYWHERE. I would much prefer the shooter be met with armed resistance than recorded to be caught later.

In fact, my solution is that an active shooter be met with swift, armed resistance. He is neutralized, his body is taken out on a stretcher, his name never released, the event is small blip in local news and we move forward.

Don't give these guys one second of attention.
 
Onewolf426 said:
Cameras everywhere? 1984, Person of Interest, Police State, Minority Report, etc.
Click to expand...
i don't care about any movies, when it should be about catching criminal activities.

we have speed cameras, and sound cameras (to catch very loud music blaring), FLOCK cameras (to catch license plates on stolen cars, or robbery suspects), why not other types of cameras.

i have said it time and time again..once one of our feet hit the sidewalk, we are "in full public view" and as such we should be recorded..now, if a person is about to commit a crime, then THAT person has something to worry about...not me, you are any other "innocent" person.

having cameras all over the place, also proves in a court of law, the guilty.
 
Old_Me said:
i don't care about any movies, when it should be about catching criminal activities.

we have speed cameras, and sound cameras (to catch very loud music blaring), FLOCK cameras (to catch license plates on stolen cars, or robbery suspects), why not other types of cameras.

i have said it time and time again..once one of our feet hit the sidewalk, we are "in full public view" and as such we should be recorded..now, if a person is about to commit a crime, then THAT person has something to worry about...not me, you are any other "innocent" person.

having cameras all over the place, also proves in a court of law, the guilty.
Click to expand...
And those same cameras can be manipulated and changed to prove anything they want to prove. You defend the 2nd Amendment and don't trust the government with their "commonsense regulations and laws", yet you will trust that very same government with a total intrusion into our lives, and trust them with "honestly and accurately, with no malice", surveillance "for our safety" with impunity? No. Just no. They can manipulate those images to support their narrative against you, me and anybody else that disagrees with them, or protests against them doing something illegal. Person of Interest is a very direct correlation to what you support. It wasn't a movie, it was a tv series. And it lays out what would happen should we ever acquiesce to that level of surveillance. Especially since AI is involved. No effin way in he ll.
 
Onewolf426 said:
And those same cameras can be manipulated and changed to prove anything they want to prove. You defend the 2nd Amendment and don't trust the government with their "commonsense regulations and laws", yet you will trust that very same government with a total intrusion into our lives, and trust them with "honestly and accurately, with no malice", surveillance "for our safety" with impunity? No. Just no. They can manipulate those images to support their narrative against you, me and anybody else that disagrees with them, or protests against them doing something illegal. Person of Interest is a very direct correlation to what you support. It wasn't a movie, it was a tv series. And it lays out what would happen should we ever acquiesce to that level of surveillance. Especially since AI is involved. No effin way in he ll.
Click to expand...
Make the Fourth Amendment Great Again
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top