And those same cameras can be manipulated and changed to prove anything they want to prove. You defend the 2nd Amendment and don't trust the government with their "commonsense regulations and laws", yet you will trust that very same government with a total intrusion into our lives, and trust them with "honestly and accurately, with no malice", surveillance "for our safety" with impunity? No. Just no. They can manipulate those images to support their narrative against you, me and anybody else that disagrees with them, or protests against them doing something illegal. Person of Interest is a very direct correlation to what you support. It wasn't a movie, it was a tv series. And it lays out what would happen should we ever acquiesce to that level of surveillance. Especially since AI is involved. No effin way in he ll.
part of the 4th
safeguarding personal privacy and property against arbitrary intrusion, though exceptions to the warrant rule exist for things like consent or plain view.
as long as you, me, whoever, is in our homes, or on our property we have privacy, from the gooberment
once, you me, whomever, steps on the sidewalk, we are "in public view" and have no more privacy...
shopping malls are public places, as are libraries, stores, hospitals, state, city, county, federal offices........and have cameras as well....yet, you me, and whomever, go into those places every so often, yet you have no issue with that i'll just be...huh..???
so why not on ALL streets, highways and bi-ways..????
did nothing wrong..??
no issues, no problems...
a criminal...??? they got problems, and deservingly so.
