testtest

The Magnum Legend: Ruger Super Redhawk

A good friend of mine works for Norma. Hard to get handguns in Sweden. So after jumping thru all the hoops to get a handgun, his choice? Ruger Redhawk in .357 Magnum. This was before the Super Redhawk. But his choice of a strong handgun that will likely go the distance for his lifetime...a Redhawk.
 
I can testify to the strength of Ruger magnums. I had a Sp101 that ate more heavy. 357 magnums thsn my hand could take and just said please sir may I have more.

Then I had a .44 Redhawk which I customized by having the barrel cut to 4.5 inches, magna-ported, action job, inverted crown, recut forcing cone and others. I put the heaviest Buffalo Bores thru it along with a lot of handloads that were frankly probably ill advised. I used smooth ivory grips on it in part that they were much more comfortable than the gripping of rubber pulling at the palm. Plus they just looked sweet.

The super Redhawk is even more of a tank, my arthritic hand weeps at what thry can probably digest.

Redhawk (1).jpg
 
My Ruger super Redhawk was a huge disappointment for my kids after the Super Blackhawk that was traded in for the Ruger Super Redhawk. They wanted me to go back and get the SBH back. They didn't like the fact that it had no recoil. I've shot some hot handloads and it shoots like shoots like a 357 shooting 38's and it wears the older Ruger rubber and wood grips.
The SBH wore big squishy Hogue grips.
I love it!! 😂
 
had redhawks and super redhawks - both are fine revolvers. Couple of points on the article - the redhawk in .44 mag doesn't have a strong recoil, at least not for me but perhaps for Kat the author. She says "Is there a lot of recoil? Yes. Do you want to spend long live fire sessions with it? No, not really." Nonsense - both types are fine for an afternoon of shooting, provided you can handle it. There is some stout recoil in the .454 casull super redhawk but then, one should expect that, and, one can carry either in a 5" bbl for self defense.
 
Back
Top