testtest

US Army Unveils New ‘M10 Booker’ Combat Vehicle

shanneba

Professional
The Army has named its new Mobile Protected Firepower vehicle the M10 Booker Combat Vehicle in honor of two soldiers who died in combat decades apart.
Announced June 10 at the National Museum of the United States Army during a celebration of the Army’s 248th birthday, the M10 Booker is named for Pvt. Robert Booker, an infantryman who was posthumously awarded the Medal of Honor for actions during World War II, and Staff Sgt. Stevon Booker, an armor soldier who was killed in Iraq in 2003 and posthumously awarded the Distinguished Service Cross.
The vehicle was unveiled during the army’s 248th anniversary celebration last week at Fort Belvoir in Virginia.

https://www.thedefensepost.com/2023/06/14/us-army-booker-vehicle/

NEW COMBAT VEHICLE NAMED FOR 2 HEROIC SOLDIERS

210924-a-ip572-gold-0066.jpg
 
Already posted last week....

Yes, well…

We didn’t have our resident “Ex”-communist armor specialist chime in on how the T72 is a far superior platform, so….tovarisch deserves another chance, nyet?
 
Last edited:
Oh, joy, another light tank. Now we have another assembly line, making another tank. Light tanks have a bad reputation; think Sheridan, M-24, M5…how many M1+++ tanks could be built for the cost of R&D alone. Much as we like new stuff, the infantry 11B types need cost effective equipment, but not a “new” tank.
 
Oh, joy, another light tank. Now we have another assembly line, making another tank. Light tanks have a bad reputation; think Sheridan, M-24, M5…how many M1+++ tanks could be built for the cost of R&D alone. Much as we like new stuff, the infantry 11B types need cost effective equipment, but not a “new” tank.
Abrams are a bit heavy & too large to go some places without the infrastructure that can support it.

There's role for the M-10, although you may disagree.

Technically, the Sheridan wasn't a light tank.
 
Back
Top