testtest

What Went Wrong with the AH-56A Cheyenne Attack Helicopter

Talyn

Emissary
Founding Member

The Lockheed AH-56A Cheyenne was more advanced than today’s AH-64 Apache, but it never went in production. Here’s why.

The Lockheed AH-56 Cheyenne was a groundbreaking but ultimately canceled prototype attack helicopter developed for the U.S. Army in the late 1960s.

It was designed as a dedicated, high-speed compound helicopter under the Army’s Advanced Aerial Fire Support System (AAFSS) program, aiming to provide superior close air support, escort, and fire support compared to armed UH-1 Huey gunships used in Vietnam.

1781553549637.png


Design and Innovations

The Cheyenne featured a unique compound helicopter configuration:

• Four-bladed rigid (hingeless) main rotor for better maneuverability and reduced weight.
• Low-mounted stub wings (about 26 ft 8 in / 8.1 m span) that provided additional lift in forward flight.
• Rear pusher propeller (three-bladed) driven by the same engine, allowing it to function more like a fixed-wing aircraft at high speeds, unloading the rotor.
• Single General Electric T64-GE-16 turboshaft engine (around 3,425–3,925 shp).

• Tandem two-crew cockpit (pilot and gunner), retractable landing gear for clearance of a belly turret, and advanced avionics including a helmet-mounted sight, night vision, laser rangefinder, and fire-control computer.

This setup enabled exceptional performance for the era, with the wings and propeller handling much of the lift and thrust in high-speed flight (rotor providing as little as 20% of lift at speed).


1781553385251.png



1781552739471.png



1781553287620.png




1781553467650.png


Armament

• Nose turret: 40 mm XM129 grenade launcher or 7.62 mm minigun.
• Belly turret: 30 mm XM140 cannon.
• Six wing hardpoints for TOW anti-tank missiles, 2.75-inch rockets, or other ordnance.

It featured sophisticated fire-control systems, including swiveling gunner stations linked to turrets.

107d9d3f-701f-386a-1d03-cc83abad430e.jpeg


When the program was cancelled in 1972, reasons stated included the inadequate night and all-weather capabilities as well as the aircraft being too large. The smaller AH-1 Cobra was now a proven alternative and much more affordable, though with inferior performance in many areas. By now most of the systems and avionics on the Cheyenne were becoming rapidly obsolete, and further improvements only meant ballooning costs once again. The Army initiated the AHH (Advanced Attack Helicopter) program just days after cancellation of the AH-56, the program eventually resulting in the AH-64 Apache attack helicopter.

There are four surviving examples of the original ten Cheyenne helicopters produced: one on display and one in storage at Fort Novosel, Alabama at the United States Army Aviation Museum, one at Fort Johnson, Louisiana, and one at Fort Campbell, Kentucky.
 
Even if it worked as intended, the CAS concept for combat aviation withered on the vine even without the USAF throwing fits. After VN, it became a maneuver arm with two functions as attack aviation and air cavalry. Hence, the Directorate of Armor Aviation developed doctrine while Rucker was a pilot's school although providing input to the former. Even though they could not perform all of the tasks of ground armor, cavalry and infantry units, the concept stuck through OIF. Doing these missions, I am less interested in high speed, push prop swooping in to perform CAS than NOE, loiter time on the battle position and air-ground integration. Rather than a Cheyenne, I'll take the latest version of a Cobra or an Apache.
 
I think I mentioned this before but I got to see the one at the Fort Rucker Army Aviation Museum when I went down to see my Song graduate Warrant Officer School & pin his wings on. Very cool looking helicopters.
 
Back
Top