Well, maybe if you remember, when they started transitioning to semi-auto most departments mandated DAO semi-auto platforms. They wanted the long trigger action similar to the revolver.
Before my time in the firearms world, honestly. I didn't get into firearms since like 2010ish and by that time the plastic fantastics Block 17 and 19 were everywhere.
I have seen the points about simple to use etc...
Aside form having to swipe a safety, I don't' see a 1911 being harder to sue than a revolver
I think learning to handle a safety would be easier to train than a god awful double action trigger.
I have seen recoil mentioned. I really don't think a 45 has that much recoil. It's a fairly soft "push". And, shootings snubby 38s is just a miserable experience.
And capacity always matters. It's one of the main reasons law enforcement goes with 9mm, those extra few rounds. No one has ever thought, I wish I had less rounds. Except maybe military guys having to carry all thier gear.
I will say, I don't have experience with an old 1911. Maybe reliability and accuracy weren't as good as I am used to.
I saw the incident with the guying having the ND when putting his 1911 away. Why lower the hammer? Safety on, reholster. No reason to be messing with the hammer.
I could maybe see a financial issue. I have worked in state government for 10 years, I know that is ALWAYS an issue. But revolvers aren't exactly cheap, either.
I don't know. Maye if I was in the 50s and I had a chance to shoot a typical for the day 1911 and a revolver, maybe I would understand.