jumpinjoe
Hellcat
Well, there ya are!!!! LOL!Ah.........I..........B.......M...see.....lol
Well, there ya are!!!! LOL!Ah.........I..........B.......M...see.....lol
art imitating life, or life imitating art? tough call. i am about to re-read a brave new world. another one along the same lines of orwell.I'm reading ( again) 1984 right now. He was right about a whole lot of things.
huh? slow it down. one more time, please.Ah.........I..........B.......M...see.....lol
Exactly! You cannot change something you do not have access to.You do understand that what we’re talking about here is a “back door” code that you can’t change, or even access, right?
I’m sure you can buy a replacement E lock. Now whether or not that new E lock comes with a master key stored with the manufacturer I don’t know.Exactly! You cannot change something you do not have access to.
The only way you could access it is if you knew the fundamentals and say worked for the safe company, even then maybe not.
It's a glorified "master key"
yes, true...i worked at several GM dealerships, and as long as there is a VIN number, keys can be cut.Liberty isn’t the only manufacturer that can access products. Several lock companies have numbers that allows keys to be cut. Also Never been a Ford guy but supposedly with a vin # and the store the vehicle was purchased can’t they make a replacement key and or FOB?
That’s a car key, not the key to your most valued possessions or constitutionally protected property. A brick or the end of your pocket knife will get you into any car.Liberty isn’t the only manufacturer that can access products. Several lock companies have numbers that allows keys to be cut. Also Never been a Ford guy but supposedly with a vin # and the store the vehicle was purchased can’t they make a replacement key and or FOB?
I bet Alexa looks like Maxine waters.even Alexa.
I bet Alexa looks like Maxine waters.
No, not hard to say it at all; the R’s controlled the house, and allowed it to leave committee to come to the floor for a vote; and the Republican majority voted for it, not against it.Actually Hans, the 'Patriot Act was passed by the Senate 98-1, and 357-66 in the House. In the house vote it was 211 of 214 Republicans in favor, and 145 of 207 Democrats in favor, and 1 ea for 2 Independents. Agree a little heavier on the Republican's side in the house, but hard to say "blame it on Republicans" don't you think?
Either way it's looked at it's a hell of a bad piece of legislation for this country. Sorta goes against everything our constitution stands for, especially now after seeing how bad it's been abused by some. I recently read or heard some number in the 100's of 1,000's (maybe more) of Americans have been spied on when it was supposed to have been mainly for suspected terrorists or Americans who were pinpointed in terrorist conversations. Even accounts of the FISA court being lied to in order to get around it. I realize it was intended to be a good thing, but like most legislation passed in the heat of the moment (just a short time after 911) there is always the rule of unintended consequences. It literally tore down most protections afforded American citizens in the 14th amendment.
I guess in any legislation can be some good, but when the bad over rides the good, is it really GOOD? I'm all in favor of ID'ing real terrorists, but I've got to believe there is a better way than this. At least I'd like to think there is.
Except for the fact that all the democrats who complained about it had the next 8 years with Obama, some of which they Held both houses, and failed to get rid of it. Also failed to codify Row v Wade and many other things they later complained about and blamed republicans for.No, not hard to say it at all; the R’s controlled the house, and allowed it to leave committee to come to the floor for a vote; and the Republican majority voted for it, not against it.
Then, of course, a Republican President signed it into law.
Very much can blame the Republicans for it; if they’d have voted against it, or vetoed it, ot would be here.
If it had never been passed in the first place, it never would have been renewed multiple times.Except for the fact that all the democrats who complained about it had the next 8 years with Obama, some of which they Held both houses, and failed to get rid of it. Also failed to codify Row v Wade and many other things they later complained about and blamed republicans for.
You can’t blame republicans and not democrats for the Patriot Act. It’s merely another glaring example of
R=D=R=D ad nauseam. Which is how we ended up with Trump and how we ended up with democrats and republicans sandbagging him, setting him up and framing him and doing literally everything they could, legal and moral or not, to get rid of him. You don’t have to like Trump to understand he was the last and only chance to get rid of the corrupt two party pile of crap that is the US government.
Even the the majority of democrats supported and voted for it they are absolved eh ?If it had never been passed in the first place, it never would have been renewed multiple times.
And that’s squarely on the Republicans who passed it.
Yeah, its all over the “conservative” news sites calling for a boycottWell that didn’t take long.
Liberty Safe allowing customers to ‘expunge’ their access codes amid calls for boycott - Washington Examiner
The gun safe manufacturer Liberty Safe has adjusted its policies in the wake of backlash it received from conservatives online after it provided the access code to one of its safes to the FBI. Liberty Safe was ordered by the federal government on Aug. 30 to give the access code to the safe of anwww.washingtonexaminer.com
I guess the same could also be said for the other side too Hans. The Dems vote (145/207) was 70% of their minority which also could have prevented it from passing. It's one argument to say that one side or the other "controlled" the house, but there's more to it than just who controlled it. It's the actual vote numbers that count on any legislation, not which party controls either house. That only means they have a majority. Regards,No, not hard to say it at all; the R’s controlled the house, and allowed it to leave committee to come to the floor for a vote; and the Republican majority voted for it, not against it.
Then, of course, a Republican President signed it into law.
Very much can blame the Republicans for it; if they’d have voted against it, or vetoed it, ot would be here.