PieterCoetzee
Professional
Anybody have experience with the Fort Scott TUI rifle ammo. I just ordered some 762x39 so I hope it works. I tried it in my PPK but it seems a smig too long
Is Fort Scott ammo factory loaded or reloads? Brass or steel?Anybody have experience with the Fort Scott TUI rifle ammo. I just ordered some 762x39 so I hope it works. I tried it in my PPK but it seems a smig too long
It's factory loaded brass cased. it is big time overpriced here. gun shop up the road gave me a gift pack of it a while back, some of it didn't go off.Is Fort Scott ammo factory loaded or reloads? Brass or steel?
What a gift huh?It's factory loaded brass cased. it is big time overpriced here. gun shop up the road gave me a gift pack of it a while back, some of it didn't go off.
Yeah the whole special extra destruction ammo is mostly marketing or only works with mixed results in certain laboratory conditions. 7.62x39 fmj is more than enough to give a target a bad day by itself. But if the price is right I'll buy any ammo of its cheap and it fires. The steel and paper targets at my range have zero prejudice to what impacts them.I agree with a lot of the experts. This whole “Tumble on impact” “RIP” and a lot of others is pure marketing BS
If you want something serious for defense just do research to what LE agencies use something similar for your caliber. I get I can’t think of any running 7.62x39 but you get the suggestion
It’s a free country to market nonsense, there are some that but I timit
You never know until you try it. Your cash your choice. In the end any shooting is just turning money into sound. Most people including myself in this thread haven't tested these types of ammo and only heard about the results from them through reading or videos.My thinking is that a tumbling bullet creates a larger permanent wound channel much more so than a fragmenting round. Fort Scott "markets" the ammo as solid copper and of course that it tumbles upon impact. It IS pricey but less so than some "performance" brands.
I dont know how well it performs but I am impressed with ammo that tumbles vs ammo that expands The original military load for the M16 (IM193) 55gr was/is ballistically pretty good stuff. The Soviet 545x39 round is also reputably good stuff because of its configuration (weight at the base) and hollow space behind the tip. The pics Ive seen show the bullet bent causing it to tumble
I ordered a few boxes for testing. My first PRIORITY is that it feeds and functions and that is reasonably accurate out to 200 meters. After that of course Id love it to act like a chainsaw....Hahaha we'll see, Ive certainly wasted more $$$ on worse things
Maybe Ill try it on a Pig Hunt? Im usually a Big Bore guy when it comes to pigs but thats likely the only way Id have to "test" itYou never know until you try it. Your cash your choice. In the end any shooting is just turning money into sound. Most people including myself in this thread haven't tested the ammo and only heard about the results from reading or videos.
I keep a lot of FMJ around and I wouldnt be upset if I only had FMJ for carry ammo. Hit LOCATION is what matters. My STEn never liked anything but FMJs, so since then I run all my military weapons with FMJs, from STEn, to Sterling, Skorpion, MP5, and Colt 635/633 DOEThe funny thing while I wouldn’t recommend ball ammo, ball isn’t quite as anemic and over penetration as some think. Ball ammo also uses causing a somewhat similar wound as when a JHP expands but not quite as much.
But again they market BS and people buy into it for twice the price
It IS pricey but so is a lot of specialized self defense ammo. Critical Defense/Duty only comes in 25 round boxes.Biggest thing i have against it is, stuff only comes in 20 round boxes and it's usually twice the price of a 50 round box of other ammo.