testtest

CCRKBA WIN: FED. JUDGE SAYS SUPPRESSOR, SBR NFA REGISTRATION UNCONSTITUTIONAL

Just cut and pasted so you could avoid all the soliciting. Seems like good news if they can get it codified before conservatives lose the Presidency.

IMG_1096.png
 
Here is some more info. Basically says one week stay for gov’t appeal (if they choose to), so things stay the same at least another week. Also explains how things may play out.

ssf.org

The NFA Registration Is Gone: What Silencer Shop Foundation v. ATF Win Means for You

The NFA Registration Is Gone: How Silencer Shop Foundation Beat the ATF SILENCER SHOP FOUNDATION News Team Donate Silencer Shop Foundation v. ATF The NFA Registration Is Gone: How We Beat the ATF...
ssf.org ssf.org
 
SimonRL said:
Assuming this stays as is does that mean that ATF will just rubber stamp any applications existing or will I be able to just walk into my LGS and pick up my suppressor?
Click to expand...
As I understand it, we could buy suppressors and SBRs and such off the shelf if registration requirements actually go away. Personally I think it’s a ways down the road. Not sure how Congress just cancels a law without some type of action.

Whatever they do, I hope they make where a (D) majority can’t just erase it without having to completely relegislate it (write law, submit to floor, votes in both chambers, submit to POTUS, etc).
 
I read that the judge, and rightfully so according to SCOTUS, made it so only in the 15 states that were part of the lawsuit. The SCOTUS ruled last year the district judges can only rule for their districts or plaintiffs after all the liberal judges tried to enjoin everyone across the country with all their illegal rulings during the Biden nightmare years.

If that is so then PA is still on the outs ...
 
Bear007 said:
I read that the judge, and rightfully so according to SCOTUS, made it so only in the 15 states that were part of the lawsuit. The SCOTUS ruled last year the district judges can only rule for their districts or plaintiffs after all the liberal judges tried to enjoin everyone across the country with all their illegal rulings during the Biden nightmare years.

If that is so then PA is still on the outs ...
Click to expand...
For now. If it holds, I foresee other (not DEEP blue) states following suit. It will get to SCOTUS who should see it as the Texas judge - since there is no tax, which with common sense equals no registration needed. I’m rooting for all Americans, but some politicos like to restrict Constitutional Rights!
 
Bear007 said:
I read that the judge, and rightfully so according to SCOTUS, made it so only in the 15 states that were part of the lawsuit. The SCOTUS ruled last year the district judges can only rule for their districts or plaintiffs after all the liberal judges tried to enjoin everyone across the country with all their illegal rulings during the Biden nightmare years.

If that is so then PA is still on the outs ...
Click to expand...
Also applies to the members of the plaintiff’s, like if you are a GOA or FCP member, silencershop client, palmetto state armory customer. The states, were in the list of plaintiff’s, but eere not even the main plaintiffs. The Firearms Coalition policy and the GOA deserve most praise, and simply donating makes you a member same as when the brace stuff fell.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top