Search results

I love it. I'd love to see more of it. I would love to see open carry of both pistols and rifles become "normal." Make American gun again

Would be a better route, but, I don't see Congress making it happen. Most likely the country will go Dem at mid-terms and then we're screwed for years You're right, a SOCTUS would require that. But those cases happen. They just nee dot take one. But there are plenty of cases of people being...

I believe they will. I could be wrong

I am talking about a law enforcement situation. There are several reasons why law enforcement officers carry the capacity they do, and reloads.

I do like revovlers. My Heritage 22 comes with me for every range trip. It is one of my favorites to shoot. I have shot some nice revolves. Shooting in a static range, they are awesome. Some day I will be a decent revolver in a real caliber. But being active law enforcement, there is no way I...

I think SOCTUS could possibly fiex this. That's how same sex marriage got recoginzed. Not through Congress, but the courts Honestly, the moment that happened, that should have created conceal carry reciprocity.

Honestly, I think we need MORE of this Then MAYBE people won't be so quick to pop off over stupid stuff People need to realize that the FO part is real and then maybe they will stop FA

There's literally no need for any of that, and no Constitutional support for it. Full faith and credit act overs it. Done No argument. Have a valid permit in one state? Good you can carry in all 50 and DC. There's simply no reason to add to it

Terrible trigger pull in double action, ridiculously limited capacity and more difficult and timely reload

And a far better choice than a revolver

I usually agree with Colion. One thing he didn't adress here. And maybe he dind't have the info But everything I read, it says she got out of the car and immediately start pointing the gun at him. Still incredibly stupid on the man's part, but, to me, that nullifies self defense and...

Key Requirements Lawful Presence: The individual must be in a location where they have a legal right to be. Trespassing or being in a restricted area disqualifies the defense . Not Engaged in Criminal Activity: Stand Your Ground does not apply if the person is committing, attempting, or...

I have been wanting to move to Idaho, anyway. Like, really, I have. I love the beauty of the Pacific Northwest, but, obviously, I can't stand Washington or Oregon Idaho is still very conservative. Now, this is icing on the cake I wonder if my time in law enforcement in PA would transfer?

I would convict here. That's simply not reasonable. One on one, no weapon on the victim, and no actual show of any intent to actually do any violence, let alone serious bodily harm or death. Taking someoene's life is the most serious thing, and you can't just do it becuase....

that would be a travesty, and a perversion of self defense laws. Self defense with lethal force should only be when you are in reasonable fear for your life or serious bodily injury I don't think a one on one situation, where one isn't armed, is reasonable fear for your life. Unless one is an...

Now that you mention it, yeah, they don't have that. They do have law enforcement spots, but not veterans

This is the only quote I need on life and death 1 Corinthians 15:55-57 O death, where is thy sting? O grave, where is thy victory? The sting of death is sin; and the strength of sin is the law. But thanks be to God, which giveth us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ.

Murder. Guy didn't have a gun, let alone any weapon. Although he kept approaching, he didn't ever actually "attack." And it's only one on one Not reasonable to expect serious bodily injury or death

18 is genrally considered an adult in the US. Why, I don't know. Maybe becuase that's teh age most graduate highschool?

I beleive that is in the works. There are many lawsuits pending now field by the DOJ. I think one of them addresses magazine restrictions. Plus, there was the recent ruling on silencers. Two different circuits ruled differently, which could (should) force SCOTUS to make a ruling. This then...