testtest

A Simple Reading of the Law is what Scares Gun Control Activists

Excellent article. The Constitution is a "living document" only in the sense that it can be changed through the democratic process, and not because unelected judges are allowed to re-interpret it using their modern progressive viewpoint. The Constitution has been amended many times. The reason the 2nd Amendment hasn't been altered in over 200 years is that there has never been enough support among the people to do so. Until there is sufficient support from the citizens to alter the 2nd Amendment, it needs to be interpreted and applied exactly as written.
 
There was no doubt in my mind that the confirmation of Judge ACB to the Supreme Court would send a chill into the extreme gun control advocates hearts, this is not because she leans left or right but that she is centered in her conviction in that the law needs to be decided as it is written and NOT interpreted by individual or emotional feelings.

Great article @Annihilator
 
Amendment II is not ambiguous:

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed. "

Infringe is not complicated: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/infringe

The only constitutional way to infringe upon rights protected within Amendment II is found with Artcile V:

www.law.cornell.edu

Article V

www.law.cornell.edu www.law.cornell.edu

No court, not even the US supreme court, has authority to circumvent Article V. We the People have been conned into believing that court opinions are products of intellectual thought. They are anything but intellectual. They're rationalizing bad behavior. Justices have become nothing more than polished con artists hustling political agendas.

I'm not sure how law schools corrupt their charges' minds. One of the most massive fallacies imbued upon law students is the legal concept of stare decisis. It's a concept that fails elementary syllogism. If your premise is false, your conclusion will be false. But lawyers aren't guided by reason and logic. Stare decisis guides them. If Roger Taney opines that human beings cannot sue for basic human rights, lawyers will parrot that ridiculous opinion like bird brains. I tried to explain the logical fallacy of stare decisis to my brother. He's made a fortune hustling logical fallacies within our country's marsupial menageries (kangaroo courts). He didn't get it. His thought processes were corrupted by stare decisis. If an opinion of the supreme court is false, any decision based upon it will be false. It's so simple that even a caveman gets it.

No court has constitutional authority to infringe upon any of our rights. Period. When justices, judges, and lawyers illogically argue that any court's decision to infringe upon Amendment II, that any gun control law is reasonable, he's hustling a con. Before any gun control law is constitutional, the constitution must first be amended consistent with Article V. Any judge or lawyer who abides by unconstitutional opinions is rationalizing bad behavior.

Rationalizing bad behavior is a very dangerous slippery slope with an abyss of enslavement lurking at the bottom.

If we have a constitution, then it's long past time that we recognize it as the supreme law of the land as written in Article VI PG 2: https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/articlevi
 
Annihilator said:
It’s not that they can’t read, it’s they don’t want to read.....
Click to expand...
It's geometrically more sinister than lack of reading comprehension. America's Fifth Column wants to destroy the United States. It interprets the United States Constitution as an impediment to effecting its diabolical agenda. America's Fifth Column proceeds with summary disregard for the Constitution of the United States.

We've been fighting a non-kinetic civil war since the very early 20th century when Satan's spawn from Eastern Europe illegally invaded our country and took over. We've had our back against the wall of enslavement since.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top