Hello all, here is today's article posted on TheArmoryLife.com. It is titled “Ayoob: Will Carrying a 10mm Hang You in Court?” and can be found at https://www.thearmorylife.com/harold-fish-10mm-court-case/.



G9 woodsman +p is the certainmy my preferred ammunition in bear country. Cougars and wolves can be neutralized with 9mm hollow points.Hollow points for bears isn’t the best idea. My wife and I are exposed to bears in AK, western NC and NH and we carry G9 Woodsman 10mm ammunition, check it out.
Not to mention liberal douchebag Prosecuter.Bad prosecution, bad defense attorney and ignorant jury pool.
I have a SA XDM Elite 10mm and althogh it is not my carry gun, I would not mind doing so if it weren't for this kind of situation. I also have the XDM in 40 cal which is a favorite.
Let me find my .22 pistol instead of this overkill 10mm...it's somewhere in my pack...hold on. I think I see it...nope, 1 more minute...That is fuddlore at its finest, like using a M2 on personnel during combat is a war crime. Self defense is self defense and if a prosecutor is defending a criminal who was shot, doesn’t matter what caliber it is, they’re going to spin it. Why didn’t you use a 38 revolver?! A semiautomatic is overkill! *clutches pearls* it’s a wepun of wuhr!!!
Those are questions of jurors which all practitioners of Jurisprudence must try to wrap their heads around- i.e. do not have engineers on your jury, etc. which fall outside the scope of the instrumentality in question or how it was used; but a competent consulting expert certainly gives one an advantage.... I happen to know where such expertise can be found.Don't know the facts in this case beyond the article, haven't read the pleadings or the record. Have not seen any discovery.
I can say that having been trying all manner of cases to juries for 20-plus years now, you just never know what a jury will do. They are always unpredictable. They are human.
Engineers are also a stubborn bunch who would acquit because they judge and/or prosecutors are clueless jackwagons. (I’m an engineer and know plenty more like me when it comes to detecting railroading, lies, and misrepresentation)Those are questions of jurors which all practitioners of Jurisprudence must try to wrap their heads around- i.e. do not have engineers on your jury, etc. which fall outside the scope of the instrumentality in question or how it was used; but a competent consulting expert certainly gives one an advantage.... I happen to know where such expertise can be found.