testtest

How to Shoot Faster (and Actually Hit)

1770913766218.gif

Sorry Mike, couldn’t resist…..😬
 
Why do folks continue to spread self defense gun training nonsense? It's just going to get people killed.

Your attacker will never stand broadside at 25 yards and wait for you to shoot them like a paper target. NEVER.
The majority of self-defense altercations occur inside 7 feet. You won't get an opportunity extend your arms, push the gun forward, get your perfect thumb over grip, or see your sights. Point, or press and shoot, while fighting off the attack inside 7 feet is the proper training format. Will your handgun go out of battery if you have to press it to your attacker and shoot? You don't hear numb gunners talk about that but it highly likely to occur.

Amazing this still continues.
 
Last edited:
I feel like I got the bait and switch. The title in the email I received was "What if you shoot first?" I thought this was going to be about engaging/eliminating a threat by shooting first and possible legal/perception issues to be aware of, not practicing to shoot faster.
 
Hi,

Why do folks continue to spread self defense gun training nonsense? It's just going to get people killed.

Your attacker will never stand broadside at 25 yards and wait for you to shoot them like a paper target. NEVER.
The majority of self-defense altercations occur inside 7 feet. You won't get an opportunity extend your arms, push the gun forward, get your perfect thumb over grip, or see your sights. Point, or press and shoot, while fighting off the attack inside 7 feet is the proper training format. Will your handgun go out of battery if you have to press it to your attacker and shoot? You don't hear numb gunners talk about that but it highly likely to occur.

Amazing this still continues.

Apparently someone has not been taking the proper training classes. My instructors incorporate CQC procedures often. We practice one-handed drawing and firing, shooting from retention, etc.

A lot of my classes will begin with a Bill Drill. We'll run it several times, increasing speed each drill, until accuracy falls apart. Students then get pointers about what to work on and improve.

Oh, and welcome to the forum. We look forward to further insights. :)


Thank you for your indulgence,

Basscliff
 
Hi,



Apparently someone has not been taking the proper training classes. My instructors incorporate CQC procedures often. We practice one-handed drawing and firing, shooting from retention, etc.

A lot of my classes will begin with a Bill Drill. We'll run it several times, increasing speed each drill, until accuracy falls apart. Students then get pointers about what to work on and improve.

Oh, and welcome to the forum. We look forward to further insights. :)


Thank you for your indulgence,

Basscliff
I think some clarity is needed here. I am trying to read this favorably and infer that your statement is about the author, not MROD, because to me you both seem to be saying the same thing differently. However, the wording of your first sentence could be interpreted as being directed at MROD, so could you clarify what the intent was?
 
Hi,

I feel like I got the bait and switch. The title in the email I received was "What if you shoot first?" I thought this was going to be about engaging/eliminating a threat by shooting first and possible legal/perception issues to be aware of, not practicing to shoot faster.

The last email I received had to do with the M1 Garand. The Armory Life has a lot of good info in their articles. Sure, some of it may be old hat if you've been training and shooting for a long time.



Occasionally SA will have an article concerned with advanced tactics...


This is the first part of an older series dealing with legal stuff...


A more recent article dealing with post-shooting trauma...


Anyway, there's some good stuff, some review stuff, and other stuff that may be of no use to some.

Golly, I must be bored today. But I've found some pretty cool articles on the website. Thanks for putting up with me. ;)


Thank you for your indulgence,

BassCliff
 
Hi,



The last email I received had to do with the M1 Garand. The Armory Life has a lot of good info in their articles. Sure, some of it may be old hat if you've been training and shooting for a long time.



Occasionally SA will have an article concerned with advanced tactics...


This is the first part of an older series dealing with legal stuff...


A more recent article dealing with post-shooting trauma...


Anyway, there's some good stuff, some review stuff, and other stuff that may be of no use to some.

Golly, I must be bored today. But I've found some pretty cool articles on the website. Thanks for putting up with me. ;)


Thank you for your indulgence,

BassCliff
I don’t get the emails, opted out of them, to may Ayoob ones…..🤣🤣
 
Hi,

I think some clarity is needed here. I am trying to read this favorably and infer that your statement is about the author, not MROD, because to me you both seem to be saying the same thing differently. However, the wording of your first sentence could be interpreted as being directed at MROD, so could you clarify what the intent was?

Welcome to the forum.

Well, I'll tell you what. When a new member shows up and posts a snarky blanket statement which is just a profound glimpse into the obvious, they might expect a little snark in return.

The OP article was only one aspect of what should be a well-rounded regimen in order to prepare for real-world situations.

I suggest that both of you hang around, read a few threads, get to know us, and become part of the community. We share all kinds of skills, expertise, and experiences. We have a lot of good times here, poking fun at each other, learning from each other, and admiring each other's Hi-Points. Pull up a keyboard and make yourself at home.


Thank you for your indulgence,

BassCliff
 
Hi,



The last email I received had to do with the M1 Garand. The Armory Life has a lot of good info in their articles. Sure, some of it may be old hat if you've been training and shooting for a long time.



Occasionally SA will have an article concerned with advanced tactics...


This is the first part of an older series dealing with legal stuff...


A more recent article dealing with post-shooting trauma...


Anyway, there's some good stuff, some review stuff, and other stuff that may be of no use to some.

Golly, I must be bored today. But I've found some pretty cool articles on the website. Thanks for putting up with me. ;)


Thank you for your indulgence,

BassCliff
Right, that is the correct email. It lists three articles, the link for What if you shoot first? takes to this How to Shoot Faster article:

WAS THE M1 GARAND

THE WRONG CHOICE?,

WHAT IF YOU SHOOT FIRST?, and

JULIE GOLOB’S ECHELON 4.0FC.

 
Hi,

Right, that is the correct email. It lists three articles, the link for What if you shoot first? takes to this How to Shoot Faster article:

WAS THE M1 GARAND

THE WRONG CHOICE?,

WHAT IF YOU SHOOT FIRST?, and

JULIE GOLOB’S ECHELON 4.0FC.


So, somebody emailed a bad link? Mis-stated or mis-typed the title of the article? It happens. Let's hope that article gets posted in the future. I'd like to hear their thoughts on that subject as well.


Thank you for your indulgence,

BassCliff
 
Hi,



Welcome to the forum.

Well, I'll tell you what. When a new member shows up and posts a snarky blanket statement which is just a profound glimpse into the obvious, they might expect a little snark in return.

The OP article was only one aspect of what should be a well-rounded regimen in order to prepare for real-world situations.

I suggest that both of you hang around, read a few threads, get to know us, and become part of the community. We share all kinds of skills, expertise, and experiences. We have a lot of good times here, poking fun at each other, learning from each other, and admiring each other's Hi-Points. Pull up a keyboard and make yourself at home.


Thank you for your indulgence,

BassCliff
I have, and I do. I saw nothing snarky in MRODs post, just their passion about training for real world situations. The article only covered speed drills, which was also "one aspect of what should be a well-rounded regimen..."

As for hanging around. There is this neat little trick here. You can hover over the poster's badge and see their joined date. I see you joined in 2021. I joined in 2022. MROD joined over a year ago. I can't speak for MROD, but I don't post much do this exact situation. Thanks for validating my perception.
 
Hi,

I have, and I do. I saw nothing snarky in MRODs post, just their passion about training for real world situations. The article only covered speed drills, which was also "one aspect of what should be a well-rounded regimen..."

As for hanging around. There is this neat little trick here. You can hover over the poster's badge and see their joined date. I see you joined in 2021. I joined in 2022. MROD joined over a year ago. I can't speak for MROD, but I don't post much do this exact situation. Thanks for validating my perception.

I try not to have a chip on my shoulder when I post. ;)

Thank you for your indulgence,

BassCliff
 
I have always used the Speed, Power, Accuracy triangle in my training courses. I absolutely agree that there is no substitute for marksmanship and that is where fundamental emphasis should be placed. We don't worry about speed at first. Speed comes with repetitive practice. I have found that practicing the draw in dry drills goes a long way to promote speed+accuracy.

I believe one should practice the draw until it becomes an automatic neuromuscular response. You know you have arrived when the gun appears in your hand, on target, with a proper grip, and no thought of how it got there. Power comes from the gun, which needs to be sufficient go get the job done but not so much report, flash, and recoil to screw up the other two points of the triangle. I'll refer back to the thread on FBI ammunition caliber selection.

What I don't worry about is foot position and stance. Of course if you have time to take a classic stance, great. But defensive shooting situations can occur so fast that you just have to go with what you have to avoid being behind the speed curve. For years we taught officers to take a non threatening bladed stance (interview or Weaver stance) when in contact with suspects so that you were already in a shooting or defensive tactics stance in the event violence suddenly erupts. That seemed to go away when the isocoles stance came into vogue. But for all your plans, a shooting position might just be whatever position you are in when the shooting starts.
 
I feel like I got the bait and switch. The title in the email I received was "What if you shoot first?" I thought this was going to be about engaging/eliminating a threat by shooting first and possible legal/perception issues to be aware of, not practicing to shoot faster.
Exactly what I was thinking!
 
Hi,



Apparently someone has not been taking the proper training classes. My instructors incorporate CQC procedures often. We practice one-handed drawing and firing, shooting from retention, etc.

A lot of my classes will begin with a Bill Drill. We'll run it several times, increasing speed each drill, until accuracy falls apart. Students then get pointers about what to work on and improve.

Oh, and welcome to the forum. We look forward to further insights. :)


Thank you for your indulgence,

Basscliff
Quick question: Shooting from retention, am I going to gas myself if my pistol has a barrel port and matching comp on top (e.g., Springfield Echelon 4.0c Comp)? I practice drawing from the holster and dry firing that way, but when I look down, I'm thinking, 'That was a good shot, but that's a big hole on top of this pistol pointing all that gas pretty much straight up toward my face.'

Or am I missing something?
 
Back
Top