That was my point, and the point that was brought to my attention when I was asking “why the switch”. If it had not been for the better design in bullet “technology” for 9mm I don’t believe they would have switched. I agree and it has been said that cost was a factor, but that was not the only factor. I mean 357 Sig, I know of several LE agencies that ran that round. That is an excellent round, well to me at least. Expensive, yes but far superior to the 9mm. I would have the 357 Sig on my hip over the .40 and day of the week and twice on Sunday, so when does expense overrule performance? I’m not saying the .40 is dead and I agree with you on several points, from what I’m seeing I see it more in competition and a few folks I know that carry and less of it in the professional world, compared to what it used to be.