rcurtner
Hellcat
Ain't life a bit**. No offense BelladonnaHmm. Still can't pick just one. Practically speaking it's hard not to say one of the VP9s or possibly the P30L, but might be I'd be better off with the Blackhawk or the 8.38" Taurus .44 mag.
Ain't life a bit**. No offense BelladonnaHmm. Still can't pick just one. Practically speaking it's hard not to say one of the VP9s or possibly the P30L, but might be I'd be better off with the Blackhawk or the 8.38" Taurus .44 mag.
Oh that's simple. My single six. We have been together 45 years, can't turn my back on her now, wouldn't be right.Since we, we meaning those who really care to answer again, are going down the old beaten to death rabbit hole of revolver vs pistol let's really do it...
Which one handgun would be your choice if you can only have one...
Getting popcorn.
Curious. Revolvers are a very wise decision for C.C. for many individuals, for a variety of very valid reasons. I'd wager most here would agree.I can't, for the life of me, understand, for the life of me, people still carry revolvers.
To each their own, and it's your choice to make, but to me it just does not make sense.
I can't, for the life of me, understand, for the life of me, people still carry revolvers.
To each their own, and it's your choice to make, but to me it just does not make sense.
I can’t, for the life of me, understand why people think they are under armed if they don’t have 30+ rounds on them for EDC; the odds of actually needing/using that many rounds is infinitesimally low.I can't, for the life of me, understand, for the life of me, people still carry revolvers.
To each their own, and it's your choice to make, but to me it just does not make sense.
ExactlyI can’t, for the life of me, understand why people think they are under armed if they don’t have 30+ rounds on them for EDC; the odds of actually needing/using that many rounds is infinitesimally low.
To each their own, yadda, yadda, yadda.
Really? Do you even take the time to read other posts? The "realism" for carrying a revolver has been laid down countless times: literally.let's be realistic
Yes, I did. My point is we carry anything, period, even though we will probably never need it. I am pointing out that even we probably won't need more than a few rounds, I still carry more rounds.Really? Do you even take the time to read other posts? The "realism" for carrying a revolver has been laid down countless times: literally.
But why carry a weapon with an every bit as realistic possibility can be non functional where the revolver can still shoot.I rarely carry a spare mag, unless I am carrying my 1911, and then I only usually carry a spare mag on for church.
My HellCat Pro has 15+1 and my G17 is 17+1.
I can't ever image being in a scenario where I said, buy, I'm glad I only had 5 or 6 rounds.
And, let's be realistic, the odds of ever needing our EDC guns, is incredibly low. Yet we still carry. So why not carry more rounds in case you are in a scenario that you do need more rounds?
Cartels and gang members .I seriously doubt anyone wakes up thinking I'm gonna be in a gunfight today. Would like to think most of us carry guns for "what if" situations. Carrying an extra mag or speed loader is just insurance for those situations.
Spare mag is most likely needed for a malfunction vs needing to use that many rounds.
I agree...and none takenAin't life a bit**. No offense Belladonna