So you thought you could register your braced pistol for free ?
- Thread starter Bassbob
- Start date
N
nmedge
Guest
When it come to money and the government nothing is "free".
Keystone19250
SAINT
Although I really enjoyed the SA Edge Pistol I owned I’m so glad I traded that in for the Emissary and although I’ve moved on from that handgun as well,
no regrets.
If I would say I had any regrets about getting rid of all my AR platform rifles it would be the first one I bought, the SA second generation Saint AR Rifle. Oh well.
Great video thanks for sharing @Bassbob
no regrets.
If I would say I had any regrets about getting rid of all my AR platform rifles it would be the first one I bought, the SA second generation Saint AR Rifle. Oh well.
Great video thanks for sharing @Bassbob
Recusant
Hellcat
Bassbob here is a news alert from VCDL that I got recently. There are several articles addressing the bumpstock issue:
Annihilator
Emissary
As I posted here in another thread, you can’t trust this administration…..sad
Keystone19250
SAINT
To avoid creating another
storm I’m going to refrain from reading the article and commenting on Bump stocks.
Annihilator
Emissary
To avoid creating another
Keystone19250
SAINT
Nothing more scary then giant turds.
Bassbob
Emissary
Did you watch it ?
The guy who posted it is licensed to build machine guns and whatever else he wants. He is very familiar with the ATF and this video is the result of an interaction he had with an ATF agent.
Belt Fed
Hellcat
I said the same thing when Biden stole the election
Bassbob
Emissary
When a whole pile of lawyers and FFL holders and others warn you against registering your braced pistols you ignore them at your own peril.
Belt Fed
Hellcat
I don't know why this reminds me of this, but do ya'll remember that reporter that shot an AR for the first time and came back with all the crazy stuff like gave him ptsd, i don't remember what all he said now and even his name, but it was funny as all get out. the best part was all the people giving him hell over it. even small children talked about him. it was so bad i think he retracted all of it. i laughed my butt off reading what that pansy said.
Bassbob
Emissary
I tried one. Ironically the one the ATF says has the most features discouraging it from shoulder fired use, the SB mini. I didn't like it at all.
SimonRL
Hellcat
Yes, I did watch it, but it was all still speculation. Fodder for the tin foil hat mob.
Bassbob
Emissary
Of course. How could I be so foolish. The ATF simply wants us all to be safe and would never dream of misleading us or using their data base to their own ends.
Area52
Professional
ATF doesn’t send attorneys to Shot Show, they send desk clerks, parroting desk clerks. These are not field agents. They are versed in the rule, the process and able to articulate on behalf of the Administration.
I’m sure in those 88 days the 4473 files have already been sorted and regional lists have been compiled. Make no mistake about it. Might take considerable manpower and some time to knock on all those doors. Any benefit for those that live on the south end of the block if the authorities come up from the north? Just asking for a friend.
Detach the brace. Either toss it or relocate it separate altogether from the receiver like a cabinet downstairs vs the safe upstairs. Don’t treat any arm brace like a classified file.
It’s so far still allowable to disengage arm braces, but again the 88 Day registration expired or is disassembly going to need a permission or intent to comply?
Open one door from outside doesn’t mean “one door” thats on the inside. Open doors allow intrusion. An arm brace in plain view by any means, is probable cause to further search.
Volunteering entry is not a wise option, with that comes a slew of ‘what else’ is or can be presented in plain view (Its called The Maralago) not limited are local jurisdiction laws - which most big cities would be willing defer to federal prosecution for the brownie points. So don’t expect a barren AR pistol to be the only thing being eyeballed.
It will be up to the legal scholars and courts as the argument is further played out whether ‘commonly, historically available“ will apply to gun parts, particularly when these parts were once accepted and no jurisprudence has ever equated them to actual overall criminal misuse. They use potentiality as a catch all. We dither back to rules and legislation and which came first, a ban or a law and which has precedence.
The objective is to keep sticking it to the law abiding and create logjams the court for political purposes.
Based on all that’s been applied to the MSR so far, I think banning any geometrically structured steel alloyed barrel might be the next wacky infringement.
I’m sure in those 88 days the 4473 files have already been sorted and regional lists have been compiled. Make no mistake about it. Might take considerable manpower and some time to knock on all those doors. Any benefit for those that live on the south end of the block if the authorities come up from the north? Just asking for a friend.
Detach the brace. Either toss it or relocate it separate altogether from the receiver like a cabinet downstairs vs the safe upstairs. Don’t treat any arm brace like a classified file.
It’s so far still allowable to disengage arm braces, but again the 88 Day registration expired or is disassembly going to need a permission or intent to comply?
Open one door from outside doesn’t mean “one door” thats on the inside. Open doors allow intrusion. An arm brace in plain view by any means, is probable cause to further search.
Volunteering entry is not a wise option, with that comes a slew of ‘what else’ is or can be presented in plain view (Its called The Maralago) not limited are local jurisdiction laws - which most big cities would be willing defer to federal prosecution for the brownie points. So don’t expect a barren AR pistol to be the only thing being eyeballed.
It will be up to the legal scholars and courts as the argument is further played out whether ‘commonly, historically available“ will apply to gun parts, particularly when these parts were once accepted and no jurisprudence has ever equated them to actual overall criminal misuse. They use potentiality as a catch all. We dither back to rules and legislation and which came first, a ban or a law and which has precedence.
The objective is to keep sticking it to the law abiding and create logjams the court for political purposes.
Based on all that’s been applied to the MSR so far, I think banning any geometrically structured steel alloyed barrel might be the next wacky infringement.