The conclusion in the article is spot on, “criminals will use whatever is available
To hurt others”
But I’m going to say this, is a 3D printable gun or the ability to make one really necessary? Should that ability be protected by the 2nd amendment?
My opinion (no)
Yeah I get it, if we allow the government to ban one type of firearm “or the ability to make one” no matter how adverse then we are (ourselves) are opening the door for the gun haters to continue to chip away at our overall rights.
But a gun created on a computer and made by a printer??
Is there a practical need?
Can this process be regulated?
A lot of questions not many answers.