testtest

What are you doing right now??

Listening to it rain, supposed to get 3 to 5 inches of it and @Annihilator in 3...2...1...
IMG_4343.gif
 
laughing at news this morning where IL and other states are freaking ..trump trolls the best way
i will send in troops to protect your city
knowing full well it is pure bluster, but they are forcing the issue to be in the news everyday by complaining about its not the feds job to protect these cities :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:
 
Hi,

I'm being a lazy toad today. I think I'll go downstairs and utilize my little workout machine. Then I'll get cleaned up, work on some music, and go to worship team practice this evening. What's a retired fellow to do? Mrs. BassCliff is still out of town so I'll be raiding the fridge for leftovers. If I don't eat them all she gets mad. It's a good thing the trash gets put out tonight. :LOL:


Thank you for your indulgence,

BassCliff
 
Today stopped by a LGS and checked out the two of the three .357 lever guns I've been considering. They are...

1) S&W 1854 Stealth Hunter
2) Marlin 1894 Trapper
3) Marlin 1894 SBL

The S&W 1854 has some great attributes (ss action & barrel with black cerakote finish over the ss) but I just can't handle the M-Lok handguard.

The Marlin 1894 Trapper is real nice. Nice Skinner (local co.) rear sight & satin SS finish. Didn't care for the stock.

But I'm settling on the Marlin 1894 SBL since it has the integrated XS rear sight/picatinny rail, and the tritium fiber-optic front sight, and a much nicer stock that the Trapper.

1756427650613.png



All three have real nice smooth actions, especially since the old Marlins typically had a rougher action that had to work in with use.

And the SBL is the cheaper of the two. Saving up some rewards to knock the price down significantly.

My .02
 
Love them lever actions! Those new ones with mlok furniture are butt ugly IMO.

I think Ruger has done a great job on the new Marlin lever actions. They are very nice.

I might have given the S&W 1954 a higher grade if it had a conventional handguard, because of it's other attributes.
 
Back
Top