Ballistics By the Inch tends to differ with you. (These are from real guns, not test barrels.)I saw a gun vid a few years ago showing 7-8" barrel maximizes velocity on most common 9mm rounds. Shorter and longer barrels than that slows the bullet. At least that's what the video demonstrated. Classic Firearms iirc. Maybe not what you asked, but it is why I chose the SP5 over the SP5K when I made that purchase. And that assumes max velocity is a goal...
Put it on a Form 4 and enjoy the advantage of the 5.5"-6.5" barrel or leave it at 16.1" and shoot it that way?
Comments? Opinions?
just like so and so's 442Some of us don't speak in manufacturers model numbers.
Not me, Classic Firearms. Velocities measured by chronograph, not gelatin depth measurement. 2 different things.Ballistics By the Inch tends to differ with you. (These are from real guns, not test barrels.)
That’s 100% correct.I have a 10.5" AR pistol in 9mm. Totally fun and worth it. Suppresses great.
Someone, a co-worker I like but don't fully trust about citing current law, mentioned I could turn it into an SBR without a stamp.![]()
That’s 100% correct.
i have a binary on my AK, its sooo much fun. wanted a forced reset for my AR but dont know if you can still get them or if they are still "legal".A 10.5" barrel or 11.5" barrel would still be a step up over the 4.25"- 4.7" barrels of most service-size pistols. An added FRT could come close to equating SMG performance. A binary trigger wouldn't raise too many eyebrows. Bear in mind this PPC has no forward assist (as if the original 5.56/.223 ever needed one). The 16.1" barrel provides great ballistics, but indoors the longer barrel can become cumbersome.
House clearing would be easier, and the muzzle blast would be limited by the birdcage (A2-type) flash hider.
This is the reasoning behind my proposition.