Great discussion and good points. I was thinking about this problem from two points of view:
First, the constitution. When someone owns real estate, they own it subject to: police power, eminent domain, taxation, and escheat. Police power mean the state has the power to regulate property use. When I refer to the "state", this includes local governments, since they are agents of their respective state and get their legal authority from the state. Or, the state can reserve rights, such as pre-emption of local laws, such as local laws prohibiting use of firearms. The state (and power given to it's subsidiaries such as counties and towns) has the right to set property use/community standards by virtue of the less often talked about 10th amendment to the constitution. So, if governments have the right to set community standards about land use on behalf of their residents, is that not as equal as the rights guaranteed by 2A?. When there is a conflict between parts of the Bill of Rights, how is that resolved?? On the other hand, does prohibiting development of gun ranges really impinge a person's right to exercise 2A? Truth be told, do you truly need a gun range to exercise your 2A rights? I think so. My town does not have a gun range. I go to a nearby town for range time. If the historical use concept in Bruen is to be applied, didn't certain communities already restrict where firearms could be used, even in 1791?
I think a good example of this problem could be a situation where a person wants to build a nudie bar next to an elementary school. Of course, there is zoning to prohibit this (I hope!). But what if the developer says his 1st amendment rights are being trampled (free speech)?
Second, there is the NIMBY issue brought up by several people. If the community doesn't want a use in it's community, who is to argue? I do think pre-existing use rules over any NIMBY protests, as people already knew what was there when the purchased their property. Buyer beware! Don't whine when a land use was already there.
Here is an example where a bunch of over-exhuberent yahoo's tried to shut down the local airport. I used to know the airport's owners (that's where I learned to fly), as well as some local residents, so I know this was a political agenda to shut their facility down.
A state Appellate Court upheld a Superior Court ruling that dismissed the township's condemnation of the airport.
www.mycentraljersey.com