testtest

ATF Press Release

so......not sure what it all means yet but this jumps out "Under ATF’s guidance, ATF will not enforce the requirements for individuals to apply and receive ATF approval before making or transferring short-barreled rifles, short-barreled shotguns, suppressors (silencers), and certain other concealable firearms known in the law as “any other weapons.” ATF also will not enforce the NFA’s registration, tax-stamp or related requirements for those covered items. " Will not enforce does not mean those regulations have gone away... some double speak going on here. What if the fed gov switches back to less 2A friendly - we're all back where we started. Still have to fill out the forms and run through NICS - not seeing this as a champagne toast moment.
 
Belt Fed said:
Gun shop owner called me at read it to me
Click to expand...
Remember…stay in skool kids.

1791581792523.gif
 

What hasn’t changed​

  • State law still applies. If suppressors are restricted in your state, this guidance does not change that. Some states only allow suppressors that are registered under federal law, and dealers may not make a transfer that violates state or local law. For that reason, ATF will continue to accept and approve Form 4s from anyone who chooses to register.
  • ATF also cautions that this policy could change. Unregistered suppressors would not automatically be grandfathered if enforcement resumed.
 
Talyn said:

What hasn’t changed​

  • State law still applies. If suppressors are restricted in your state, this guidance does not change that. Some states only allow suppressors that are registered under federal law, and dealers may not make a transfer that violates state or local law. For that reason, ATF will continue to accept and approve Form 4s from anyone who chooses to register.
  • ATF also cautions that this policy could change. Unregistered suppressors would not automatically be grandfathered if enforcement resumed.
Click to expand...
But you have to remember, if enforcement resumed, it would automatically go back to the court case in Texas, and the judge that ruled that the ATF was not allowed to do that. Unless Congress put it into law that suppressors were now taxed again, and then it would go back to NFA status in theory, but again the cats out of the bag, there’s damn near no way to put it back.

And this goes as a message to all the people that are mad at Trump and not gonna vote Republican, just to spite him, if we do lose the house or the Senate, nothing else is gonna get done for the next two years. And if we get a Democrat president, they damn sure are going to try to put this cat back in that bag. Trump may not be perfect, but we have two more years to to appoint as many judges as possible that will rule based on the Constitution and not their own feelings. basically, you may not like Trump, but the alternative for a 2A voter is not good
 
Talyn said:

What hasn’t changed​

  • State law still applies. If suppressors are restricted in your state, this guidance does not change that. Some states only allow suppressors that are registered under federal law, and dealers may not make a transfer that violates state or local law. For that reason, ATF will continue to accept and approve Form 4s from anyone who chooses to register.
  • ATF also cautions that this policy could change. Unregistered suppressors would not automatically be grandfathered if enforcement resumed.
Click to expand...
  • ATF also cautions that this policy could change. Unregistered suppressors would not automatically be grandfathered if enforcement resumed.
Never thought if this…..🤔🤔
 
Here's my deal, if the law is made i will pretty much comply if it's reasonable, but if they change it and say we can do this and i spend a lot of money on stacks and they up and change their minds, then they can kiss my rosie red butt. i'm NOT putting it back. and i was really nice wording that. that's a crock of crap to tell people yeah go ahead a modify your guns we don''t care but we might change our minds later, that"s BS.
 
Belt Fed said:
Here's my deal, if the law is made i will pretty much comply if it's reasonable, but if they change it and say we can do this and i spend a lot of money on stacks and they up and change their minds, then they can kiss my rosie red butt. i'm NOT putting it back. and i was really nice wording that. that's a crock of crap to tell people yeah go ahead a modify your guns we don''t care but we might change our minds later, that"s BS.
Click to expand...
Dollars to donuts, Congress will enact a law very similar to the GCA of 68 sometime soon. My guess is as soon as Trump is out of office...
 
Belt Fed said:
Here's my deal, if the law is made i will pretty much comply if it's reasonable, but if they change it and say we can do this and i spend a lot of money on stacks and they up and change their minds, then they can kiss my rosie red butt. i'm NOT putting it back. and i was really nice wording that. that's a crock of crap to tell people yeah go ahead a modify your guns we don''t care but we might change our minds later, that"s BS.
Click to expand...
Exactly. What I have, I have. And keep. Fat chance I give up anything. What are they going to do, go house to house and "take" it all back?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top