testtest

Ayoob: Will Carrying a 10mm Hang You in Court?

Massad Ayoob doesn't seem to make the point that one could have argued that the 10mm was actually "too powerful" for human targets and therefore it was an indication that it was actually carried to protect from the heavier black bears and not humans.
 
Massad Ayoob doesn't seem to make the point that one could have argued that the 10mm was actually "too powerful" for human targets and therefore it was an indication that it was actually carried to protect from the heavier black bears and not humans.
That and it really doesn’t matter for a case study that was on a miscarriage of justice. Ayoob creates fuddlore as king Fudd
 
That and it really doesn’t matter for a case study that was on a miscarriage of justice. Ayoob creates fuddlore as king Fudd
YES it was a prosecution over reach, but I disagree about the FUDD tag. He presented the case based on legal records. He simply presented the question for debate; unless youre seeing something different. If thats the case perhaps you could explain???
 
Im just curious, what is he saying that you think is wrong? Im truly interested
The entire outlook on the 10mil has changed since the Fish fiasco. That whole trial, re-trial refusal has been beat to death and proven it was ONE district attorney trying to garner attention in any way possible.
if anything, that trial can be used as case law against trying someone based solely on using a 10mm.
 
The entire outlook on the 10mil has changed since the Fish fiasco. That whole trial, re-trial refusal has been beat to death and proven it was ONE district attorney trying to garner attention in any way possible.
if anything, that trial can be used as case law against trying someone based solely on using a 10mm.
The FBI tried to use 10mm too, but didn’t because some agents had hands that were too small for the pistols.
 
Back
Top