testtest

Progress on Berry's plated bullets reloads

RedGoat

Master Class
Nope. I haven't given up on my quest to make the Berry's 38/357 125 grain flat point plated bullets shoot well. I somehow managed to let almost the the entire month of May slip by without working on it, but I'm back at it again.

What I'm finding (I think, more testing is needed) is that these slugs want to be seated DEEP into the case. I am now seating them at a COAL of 1.340" in 38 Special cases trimmed METICULOUSLY to 1.145" +/- .001" . Cases are measured and trimmed only AFTER resizing and flaring case mouth. The reason for taking so much care is that the 1.340" COAL puts entire shank of the bullet inside the case with the bullet shoulder (where the shank bearing surface meets the ogive) just a smidge below the case mouth. Once the case is charged, primed and bullet is seated, I apply a normal roll crimp OVER that shoulder. When doing this, beware that the effect of the roll crimp over the bullet shoulder is that the bullet is nudged a bit deeper by the crimping action by about .002" to .004", so COAL after crimping is 1.336" to 1.338".

Of course, moving the bullet seating depth from a COAL of 1.450" all the way down to 1.340" is certainly a significant reduction in case volume and a corresponding increase in load density. Thus, it calls for re-testing my charge ladder. I have done so with one powder now, Hodgdon's TiteGroup. I've shot the entire span of the 38 Special START load given by Hodgdons all the way up to their peak 38 Special +P charge (for a 125 grain bullet). I use .2 grain increments between each charge weight "ladder rung". I'm testing right now only in a singe revolver, a Ruger Blackhawk with a 6 1/2" barrel. Velocities range all the way from about 700 fps at the bottom level up to just a shade over 1000 fps at the peak 38 +P charge weight. Primers look good throughout the range, the fired cases extract from the cylinder charge holes smoothly, and the cases do not show much in the way of looking "smoked up" (which says the cases are obturating very well).

But here's the good part: Extreme velocity spread up and down the entire spectrum of charge weights plummeted from the completely unacceptable 150 - 200 fps level down (with a 1.450" COAL) to 50 - 60 fps (with a 1.340" COAL and substantial roll crimp), which is a shade less than my favored factory range ammo exhibits. Ogg very happy now.

I'm now curious if the reduced case capacity (from deeper bullet seating) is the main factor in the improved ES values, or if it is only the increased "grip" the cases have on the bullets with the deeper seating. I might run another ladder test with the bullet seating depth set to give a COAL of 1.390" or even 1.400" and a light taper crimp to see if the ES values stay low, or if they start to climb again.
 
Last edited:
The shorter you make the cartridge the further the bullet has to jump before it engages the forcing cone and then the rifling which means the projectile has more time to become crooked. Or it could be your handgun won’t shoot the Berry bullets well. The old Marlin micro grove barrels would not shoot cast bullets with any kind of accuracy. That was because the bullet was plowing through the rifling and not getting enough spin on the projectile to stabilize it. You can slug your barrel to see if it’s on the larger size. Berry bullets is pure lead with a cooper plating. So I’m wondering if your bullet is plowing through the rifling. Good luck hope this helps you figure it out.
 
When using the Berry's or Rainier, you need to treat them like straight lead bullets. You need a good crimp, that being said, a little too much will tear off or into the copper plating, It's much thinner, say like copper foil. Unlike say a jacketed bullet.
I used the Rainier 115 grain HP 9mm bullet with great success using 4.2 grains Bullseye powder in a Remington+p+ case.
 
The shorter you make the cartridge the further the bullet has to jump before it engages the forcing cone and then the rifling which means the projectile has more time to become crooked. Or it could be your handgun won’t shoot the Berry bullets well. The old Marlin micro grove barrels would not shoot cast bullets with any kind of accuracy. That was because the bullet was plowing through the rifling and not getting enough spin on the projectile to stabilize it. You can slug your barrel to see if it’s on the larger size. Berry bullets is pure lead with a cooper plating. So I’m wondering if your bullet is plowing through the rifling. Good luck hope this helps you figure it out.
@Condition1, thank you for your input. I appreciate it and I can use all the help I can get! LOL.

Shooting multiple guns (more than a few). It's not the gun(s). Same wild ES in all of them (in initial tests). And they're 357 magnum revolvers, so the 38 special cartridges are already making quite a jump. Another hundredth of an inch or even one tenth of an inch one way or another will matter. Think "full wadcutter". They make a far greater jump, even in a 38 Special cylinder, and yet they purportedly yield quite satisfactory accuracy. Otherwise, the experienced bullseye shooters would have abandoned them.

As I stated in my original post, getting that bullet deeper into the case where I can put a good roll crimp over the shoulder has given me the best results so far, and the ES numbers are now better than the factory ammo I've been shooting.

I'm keenly aware that the Berry's bullets are mostly pure lead with a thin copper plating that one must take care not to rupture. That's why I started off initially trying to get by with a taper crimp.

Since I posted above, I've had a little more time to analyze my chrono data from the last two range trips and it reveals that even with the bullet shoved much deeper into the case, the roll crimp outperforms a taper crimp. Significantly and consistently. So roll crimp it will be.

My next trip to the range will encompass testing of ammo with an "in between" seating depth (deeper than a 1.450" COAL, but not all the way to the radical 1.380" or 1.340" COAL. Probably around 1.400" COAL. And it will feature a VERY light roll crimp so as to not fracture that thin copper plating nor "rumple" cartridge case (easily done when roll crimping with no cannelure).

More to come once I get the loading and shooting done.
 
Last edited:
When using the Berry's or Rainier, you need to treat them like straight lead bullets. You need a good crimp, that being said, a little too much will tear off or into the copper plating, It's much thinner, say like copper foil. Unlike say a jacketed bullet.
I used the Rainier 115 grain HP 9mm bullet with great success using 4.2 grains Bullseye powder in a Remington+p+ case.
@Pitdogg2: Thanks for the reminder about plated bullets. The thin plating is part of what has made this project challenging (I think) from the outset. Yes, they need a crimp. No, they don't have a crimp groove... What's a reloader to do? It's sorta like trying to walk across an immaculate lawn wet with morning dew and not leave a footprint.

No Alliant powders allowed in this testing. Part of my stated goals for this project is to find a suitable replacement for Bullseye and Unique. Hodgdon's TiteGroup is starting to look very promising in that respect.

With regard to crimping, I've already tried a "light" taper crimp, a "medium" taper crimp, and a "heavy" taper crimp. I applied the crimps to bullets in cases with no powder and no primer (essentially a dummy round) and then turned around and pulled the bullets to see how much of an indentation each level of crimp was putting into the bullets. All left a mark and none "broke the skin" of the copper plating. I then loaded up live rounds with each crimp level and ran them over the chronograph. The extreme spread values were 150 FPS up to over 200 FPS. Very unsatisfactory. This was with a 1.450" COAL in 38 special cases trimmed to EXACTLY 1.145" + / - .001".

ONLY after I went to the 1.380" COAL seating depth did the taper crimp "work", but the performance yielded by a roll crimp at that seating depth consistently exceeded that of the taper crimps.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top