testtest

Second Amendment Rests on Georgia Senate Runoffs.

Status
Not open for further replies.
That is a overly broad generalization that's really biased opinion.

President Trump ran for altruistic reasons. He knew that the United States of America had been co-opted by nefarious, private, neocon interests, many of foreign origin. My take on President Trump is he's the antithesis of megalomaniac. He, like tens of millions of American patriots, recognized that the USA was at the precipice of irrevocable transition from the illusion of self-government to the reality of totalitarian plutocracy. My take on President Trump is he knew that had Hillary seized power, de facto recognition of subjugation of Americans would have been the likely consequence.

Americans are the mot easily propagandized people on Earth. They'll believe what they're told without question or motivation to research validity of information (read: propaganda).

Fear has always been an efficacious tool of propagandists. We need to look no further than frightened Americans blithely obeying social distancing and covering their mugs with ridiculously stupid masks in response to a relatively harmless virus that has an actual mortality rate of <.05% My physician told me I have greater probability of dying by lightening strike than covid-19. Yet compliantly docile Americans have gone full lemming in obedience to dissembling politicians hustling a lie while concealing a hideous ulterior motive. They have obediently and severely compromised their quality of lives and devastated their wealth at the directives of totalitarian politicians' lies. Americans have assumed automaton status. They lack analytical ability to assess. If politicians aren't complying with directives that they have foisted upon We the People, how serious is covid-19?

Tell a huge lie often enough and Americans will believe it. Factor in the ten percent tipping point, and shackles won't be necessary for our ruling elite to exert total control over every aspect of We the People's lives. Rights will vanish, and liberties will become subjected to caprice of our rulers.

Comfort is the most insidious form of oppression. Create the illusion of comfort, and people will fasten shackles to themselves.

President Trump has endured four years of our ruling elite's artillery barrages. He was not an anointed member of America's ruling elite. He was a dangerous enemy of America's fifth column. President Trump has attempted to return the United States of America to We the People from who it was stolen.

Argumentum ad hominem is an veiled response to peril of lies at risk of exposure. The second I hear or read an an hominem rejoinder, I know that a lie or lies is/are are at risk of exposure. Conspiracy theorist is the noun clause most favored by those hiding facts. Like an obedient, obsequious moron, I believed government's lie about the murder of JFk. Only upon undertaking serious commitment to discovering truth for myself did I conclude that Oswald was a patsy. Operatives/agents of the government of the United States of America murdered JFK. LBJ orchestrated JFK's murder. LBJ should have been the only president in the history of America to have been arrested while president, booked, tried, and executed for the murder of JFK. You don't have to believe me. I can put you on to many scholarly texts that have thoroughly analyzed evidence. There were hundreds of Super 8 film that captured the murder of JFK. All cameras were confiscated. Americans were shown only an edited version of the infamous Zapraduer film. They didn't see actual film of the fatal bullet impacting JFK's forehead. That film destroyed the Warren Commission report and the lie that patsy Oswald murdered JFK. It obliterated the lone gunman lie. It revealed the existence of a conspiracy to murder JFK. If you're still buying the official government report, hopefully LBJ's acknowledging a possible conspiracy to murder JFK will shaken you to reality. LBJ knew exactly who orchestrated the murder of JFK: he did, which was why he could never allow Bobby Kennedy to become president.

Media and politicians are assiduously working to propagandize Americans that 2020 presidential election fraud is conspiracy theory. It ain't theory if it's fact.

If Biden is allowed to steal the 2020 presidential election from President Donald J Trump, who legitimately won in an historic landslide, it will be all the proof you'll need that the constitutional republic created by shed blood of our Founding Fathers died long before LBJ was point man on JFK's murder.

If secret, private interests (dirt bag criminals) could murder a sitting president with impunity, rigging a president election would be simple. If Americans were so thoroughly gullible to buy the Warren Commission Report, selling a rigged election to We the People would be easier than selling ammo in a market where supply is nonexistent. The unknown is whether Americans comprehend consequences of accepting a rigged election. Americans are sententiously proud without intellectual foundation. If a rigged election is allowed to stand, the consequence is the country created by shed blood of our Founding Fathers will become a dandified Third World banana republic where coup d'état (JFK's murder, contrived impeachment of President Trump, rigged 2020 presidential election) is de rigueur, justice is bought and sold, and the unwashed masses (We the People) are ruled by a totalitarian plutocracy.

Based upon my knowledge and experience, when you hear argumentum ad hominem rejoinders, what follows will be lies to protect bigger lies.
And your response was an incredibly long and tedious explanation that completely missed the point of my comment. His motivations are irrelevant. The fact that the election was a fraud is now irrelevant. Unless you’re ready to put a gun in your hand and march on Washington, it’s all irrelevant. The only thing that matters now is maintaining the senate. He has the unique ability (in the entire country) to direct an incredible amount of power, influence, and energy into that endeavor but has chosen to pout.
I am a hard core Trump supporter. The only bias I have is against Marxist, Communist, socialist liberals, and lying corrupt republicans. He can be a megalomaniac and also want whats best for our citizens. They’re not mutually exclusive but they can certainly interfere with each other, an ebb and flow we’ve seen several times over his administration. As for now, he is forever tainting 4 years of amazing progress with 1 month of childishness and quite possibly destroying a country in the process.
But of course, your assertion that anyone who opposes your viewpoint is spewing ad hominem rejoinders allows you to be right, no matter the rebuke, because you have presented an argumentum circulus in probando (of circular reasoning). So this will be the end of my ‘pointless’ engagement as my not-quite-as-long explanation has become equally tedious.
 
:rolleyes:

1609133593909.png
 
Last edited:
And your response was an incredibly long and tedious explanation that completely missed the point of my comment. His motivations are irrelevant. The fact that the election was a fraud is now irrelevant. Unless you’re ready to put a gun in your hand and march on Washington, it’s all irrelevant. The only thing that matters now is maintaining the senate. He has the unique ability (in the entire country) to direct an incredible amount of power, influence, and energy into that endeavor but has chosen to pout.
I am a hard core Trump supporter. The only bias I have is against Marxist, Communist, socialist liberals, and lying corrupt republicans. He can be a megalomaniac and also want whats best for our citizens. They’re not mutually exclusive but they can certainly interfere with each other, an ebb and flow we’ve seen several times over his administration. As for now, he is forever tainting 4 years of amazing progress with 1 month of childishness and quite possibly destroying a country in the process.
But of course, your assertion that anyone who opposes your viewpoint is spewing ad hominem rejoinders allows you to be right, no matter the rebuke, because you have presented an argumentum circulus in probando (of circular reasoning). So this will be the end of my ‘pointless’ engagement as my not-quite-as-long explanation has become equally tedious.
With due respect, you've missed my thesis.

The Republican Party has been co-opted by neocons. Neocons are America's most grave threat. Their primary objective is the New World Order, globalism. one-world-government, super government, etc. They're synonymous terms for the same outcome. Destruction of the sovereignty of the United States of America is a precursor to neocons' primary objective.

Mitch McConnell is a Republican. He wants President Trump gone more so than Democrats. He's ordered Republican senators to accept results of a fraudulent election. Republican is wholly insufficient to predict actions. Both Bushes were Republicans. Romney is Republican. All three are in reality liberal Democrats.

I didn't vote in 2012. I didn't care who lost. Romney earned his moniker of The White Obama.

Don't focus on Republican affiliation as basis for predictions. Neocon Republicans have a long rap sheet for gun control. Reality is who wins in Georgia is immaterial if an obviously fraudulent election is allowed to stand. Operatives in shadows who in fact rule We the People have implemented their plan. The outcome is fait accompli.

A kinetic response to a stolen election is not merely the wrong response, it eliminates a far more efficacious response: civil disobedience. If Americans, in coordinated action, were to engage in nationwide civil disobedience, it would cripple the USA. Civil disobedience was MLK's preferred and only response to denial of civil rights. MLK knew that violence would produce negative results.

Finally and factually, if an obviously rigged election is allowed to stand, will it really matter who's ostensibly in control of any branch of government when we'll know that operatives in shadows are really running our country?

Let me ask you a question that was asked of me some 15 years ago: how do you KNOW the United States is not a satellite state of the New World Order? I want to believe that we're not, but I do not know that we're not. In freedom, sovereignty, rights, and individual liberties, beliefs are immaterial. Knowledge is.

Okie, how do you know that the United States of America is not a satellite state of a global government?

Given Mitch McConnell's directive to Republican senators, do you really believe Georgia's election will make a difference? Mitch is already sleeping with rabid dogs.
 
I love how the conspiracy delusions are inevitable out this guy.

And I do mean delusions, not theories...because a theory is thought out and rational, not the fever dreams presented here.
What would you consider a conspiracy theory?
 
Does anyone really believe the outcome of the Georgia senate race will matter with neocon Republicans like this moron in the senate>

Regardless of who wins in Georgia, We the People have already lost.
 
And your response was an incredibly long and tedious explanation that completely missed the point of my comment. His motivations are irrelevant. The fact that the election was a fraud is now irrelevant. Unless you’re ready to put a gun in your hand and march on Washington, it’s all irrelevant. The only thing that matters now is maintaining the senate. He has the unique ability (in the entire country) to direct an incredible amount of power, influence, and energy into that endeavor but has chosen to pout.
I am a hard core Trump supporter. The only bias I have is against Marxist, Communist, socialist liberals, and lying corrupt republicans. He can be a megalomaniac and also want whats best for our citizens. They’re not mutually exclusive but they can certainly interfere with each other, an ebb and flow we’ve seen several times over his administration. As for now, he is forever tainting 4 years of amazing progress with 1 month of childishness and quite possibly destroying a country in the process.
But of course, your assertion that anyone who opposes your viewpoint is spewing ad hominem rejoinders allows you to be right, no matter the rebuke, because you have presented an argumentum circulus in probando (of circular reasoning). So this will be the end of my ‘pointless’ engagement as my not-quite-as-long explanation has become equally tedious.
☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️👋👏👏👏👏👏👏👏
Perfectly said and right to the point.
 
With due respect, you've missed my thesis.

The Republican Party has been co-opted by neocons. Neocons are America's most grave threat. Their primary objective is the New World Order, globalism. one-world-government, super government, etc. They're synonymous terms for the same outcome. Destruction of the sovereignty of the United States of America is a precursor to neocons' primary objective.

Mitch McConnell is a Republican. He wants President Trump gone more so than Democrats. He's ordered Republican senators to accept results of a fraudulent election. Republican is wholly insufficient to predict actions. Both Bushes were Republicans. Romney is Republican. All three are in reality liberal Democrats.

I didn't vote in 2012. I didn't care who lost. Romney earned his moniker of The White Obama.

Don't focus on Republican affiliation as basis for predictions. Neocon Republicans have a long rap sheet for gun control. Reality is who wins in Georgia is immaterial if an obviously fraudulent election is allowed to stand. Operatives in shadows who in fact rule We the People have implemented their plan. The outcome is fait accompli.

A kinetic response to a stolen election is not merely the wrong response, it eliminates a far more efficacious response: civil disobedience. If Americans, in coordinated action, were to engage in nationwide civil disobedience, it would cripple the USA. Civil disobedience was MLK's preferred and only response to denial of civil rights. MLK knew that violence would produce negative results.

Finally and factually, if an obviously rigged election is allowed to stand, will it really matter who's ostensibly in control of any branch of government when we'll know that operatives in shadows are really running our country?

Let me ask you a question that was asked of me some 15 years ago: how do you KNOW the United States is not a satellite state of the New World Order? I want to believe that we're not, but I do not know that we're not. In freedom, sovereignty, rights, and individual liberties, beliefs are immaterial. Knowledge is.

Okie, how do you know that the United States of America is not a satellite state of a global government?

Given Mitch McConnell's directive to Republican senators, do you really believe Georgia's election will make a difference? Mitch is already sleeping with rabid dogs.
Thesis??????? With due respect both your post have missed the point of this thread as practically all your post do.
Classic examples of diarrhea of the mouth.
 
I've learned it's best not to engage SATRP on topics like this. It's never productive. I'm normally happy to debate anything on here but with him/her it quickly devolves into what I'll generously describe as fringe ideas. It's best to just let it alone and drop it for the sake of decorum before the thread turns personal.
 
And your response was an incredibly long and tedious explanation that completely missed the point of my comment. His motivations are irrelevant. The fact that the election was a fraud is now irrelevant. Unless you’re ready to put a gun in your hand and march on Washington, it’s all irrelevant. The only thing that matters now is maintaining the senate. He has the unique ability (in the entire country) to direct an incredible amount of power, influence, and energy into that endeavor but has chosen to pout.
I am a hard core Trump supporter. The only bias I have is against Marxist, Communist, socialist liberals, and lying corrupt republicans. He can be a megalomaniac and also want whats best for our citizens. They’re not mutually exclusive but they can certainly interfere with each other, an ebb and flow we’ve seen several times over his administration. As for now, he is forever tainting 4 years of amazing progress with 1 month of childishness and quite possibly destroying a country in the process.
But of course, your assertion that anyone who opposes your viewpoint is spewing ad hominem rejoinders allows you to be right, no matter the rebuke, because you have presented an argumentum circulus in probando (of circular reasoning). So this will be the end of my ‘pointless’ engagement as my not-quite-as-long explanation has become equally tedious.
Again, I agree with Okie’s post.
 
I've learned it's best not to engage SATRP on topics like this. It's never productive. I'm normally happy to debate anything on here but with him/her it quickly devolves into what I'll generously describe as fringe ideas. It's best to just let it alone and drop it for the sake of decorum before the thread turns personal.
That's because you're a definitive neocon who presents specious conjectures facts.

You've yet to cogent support a single talking point. You merely adhere to Saul Alinsky's tactics.
 
That's because you're a definitive neocon who presents specious conjectures facts.

You've yet to cogent support a single talking point. You merely adhere to Saul Alinsky's tactics.
Swing and a miss on that one. Thanks for playing.
 
Okie, et al

Neocons have a long rap sheet for going sideways on conservatives. Perhaps a review of neocon support support for the Brady Bill might coax you in to analytical thinking.

Okie, et al, explain to me why you believe that Georgia's senate election matters. Do you really believe that neocons will not vote in harmony with Democrats on issues crucial to defending the paucity of rights and individual liberties We the People have remaining?

How would you suppose McConnell, Romney, Murkowski, Inhofe, Toomey, et al are going to vote on issues crucial to defending our constitutional republic? Do you really believe those neocons will protect and defend Amendment II?

Democrats know that they own neocon Republicans.

So, Okie, tell me how you know Georgia's election will benefit conservatives? Take your time. Think clearly and analytically, and cogently defend your thesis. And refrain for ad hominem rejoinder. It's logical fallacy that's used only when one lacks intellectual ability to cogently refute posited arguments. Reason, logic, and facts are much better options.

Conspiracy theory is the iconic ad hominem rejoinder. Use of it reveals far more about its user than his argument. It's puerile logical fallacy.

I'll be waiting for your reply.

If this helps, we've lost the battle for Lady Liberty a century ago. The country created by shed blood of our Founding Fathers was interred a century ago. Romney supporters assured her resurrection would remain impossible.

Bush 43 had Republican control of the house and senate. He did nothing to restore stolen Amendment II rights. He did nothing to cut/eliminate governmental largess. And you think senate neocons will do what?

The ONLY bulwark We the People have for preserving the sovereignty of the United States of America is President Donald J Trump's veto power. If he is denied his legitimate landslide victory, who loses in Georgia won't matter. Hence, my advice to you is to appropriate your time assuring justice is done rather than chasing red herrings in Georgia.

While your contemplating your reply, getting up to speed on the Creature from Jekyll Island might stimulate deep thought processes. BTW, the Creature from Jekyll Island and its buttressing companion, Amendment XVI, were crafted in a shroud of secrecy as mechanisms to more strictly control We the People while immensely enriching our ruling elite:

 
You're on the wrong team. Your blue uniform belies your spurious propaganda.
Drop it, bud. I think you should be able to see from the above posts that people are done with this conversation. There's nothing for you to gain by continuing.
 
I watched Professor Niall Ferguson's ominous Empires on the Edge of chaos speech maybe 7 years ago. You can skip the first 9 or so minutes, which expound Professor Ferguson's numerous accolades and peer recognition. Ferguson is or was a Professor at Harvard and Stanford. Professor Ferguson devastated commonly accepted myths about destructions of empires. BTW, our Founding Fathers created a constitutional republic. They loathed and feared empires, for empires are ruled by emperors. Back to Empires on the Edge of Chaos. About 30 minutes into Ferguson's factual and riveting speech, I realized the he was referring the the USA on the edge of chaos.

America's chaos was planned to occur over a century ago. I'm sure that concerned patriots with prescience to see the end game at play were pejoratively labeled conspiracy theorists by anti-Christian and anti-America traitors:

 
Drop it, bud. I think you should be able to see from the above posts that people are done with this conversation. There's nothing for you to gain by continuing.
And you're spokesmen for other posters? Why would you assume that they need you to think for them?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top