testtest

The Realities Of Long-Range Hunting

Talyn

Emissary
Founding Member
Good Article...
-------------------------------

Uncontrollable variables and physics argue strongly against excessively long-range hunting. But how far is too far?

The debate over long-range hunting has long existed.

Technological advances over the past quarter century have accentuated it. Laser rangefinders. High magnification scopes. High-BC bullets. Pocket anemometers with barometric pressure gauges. Computerized scopes and binoculars. Turret dialing scopes. Even scopes that automatically illuminate the proper aiming dot for precise shot placement at any distance.

How far is too far? How do we define unethical and irresponsible?


1786397706361.png
 
Several things I was taught as a lad, no shots where: you can't be sure of what is behind the target, no shots except the animal is on the hoof and not bedded down, for waterfowl - none on the water - only shots once birds are on the "wing", flying. And so on. We didn't have all the fancy scope and calculators back then so ethical shots meant what you can reasonably do and no more. It is a good discussion, best had with beverages 'round a warm fire with good friends.
 
Just because we can, don't mean we ought to...

That was something hammered into my thick skull more than twice. About many things, hunting especially. When I started hand gunning, I limited my shot to the caliber I was using. The gun limit left me with humane and makable shots.
 
Oh come on, if you can't make the shot because you don't practice, don't knock on someone that can because they do.

I practice to 800 and wouldn't hesitate to take that shot if all conditions are right. I shoot whitetails in the head at 200+ yards on the regular. My longest whitetail kill is 538.7 yards. 1 shot anchored where it stood. The only reason I havent taken one longer is the lack of open spaces in Alabama to do so.
 
Back
Top