testtest

They killed a lawmaker

Lab4Us said:
This should also serve as a reminder that your home is not necessarily bulletproof either. I believe both these shooting occurred in the victims’ homes.
Click to expand...
yup
and a few lawmakers were on cnn stating they all need 24 7 security...omg could you imagine?
think about how un reachable and LET THEM EAT CAKE it would be if they were some how placed into an even more protected class
adam lied for 4 years on cnn, and was not doing congressional work...yet he got a pardon against prosecution for lying
do pres pardons cover civil liability?

its a very sad day that lawmakers are murdered. PERIOD
its also just as bad to dox supreme court with release of their addresses ,
not that it was not that hard to find, but the lack of protection for them afterwards was appalling
 
powerboatr said:
and a few lawmakers were on cnn stating they all need 24 7 security...omg could you imagine?
Click to expand...
I figure they can be allotted the same security I’m allotted (since I’m not protected from their ANTIFA friends or the other perpetrators of their “peaceful” “demonstrations” - AKA VIOLENT RIOTS). [Not to mention their recidivist constituents that think it’s okay to steal what’s mine because I applied myself throughout my life and they didn’t, all the while blue states DA’s releasing them as fast as they’re arrested].

1) I buy my own guns/ammo and practice regularly with them, 2) I adopted/trained my own dogs, and 3) I am in a Constitutional Carry State and keep my license to carry up to date.

Since the ones screaming the loudest for private security were likely Dems from blue states, they may need to afford their states populace actual 2A rights as intended in the Bill of Rights before those lawmakers screaming for security are able to enact #1, or carry a weapon themselves.
 
Last edited:
Lab4Us said:
I figure they can be allotted the same security I’m allotted (since I’m not protected from their ANTIFA friends or the other perpetrators of their “peaceful” “demonstrations” - AKA VIOLENT RIOTS). [Not to mention their recidivist constituents that think it’s okay to steal what’s mine because I applied myself throughout my life and they didn’t, all the while blue states DA’s releasing them as fast as they’re arrested].

1) I buy my own guns/ammo and practice regularly with them, 2) I adopted/trained my own dogs, and 3) I am in a Constitutional Carry State and keep my license to carry up to date.

Since the ones screaming the loudest for private security were likely Dems from blue states, they may need to afford their states populace actual 2A rights as intended in the Bill of Rights before those lawmakers screaming for security are able to enact #1, or carry a weapon themselves.
Click to expand...
This. Killing ANYBODY because you disagree with them is wrong, however people who want to take away our right to defend ourselves should NOT be getting armed security on our dime. I mean “nobody needs guns Except my bodyguards” is pretty BS. If there is a known threat they should be protected just like any other citizen, however for normal situations they should be like we the people. Besides, I’ll guarantee politicians are more able to afford security than you and I are. Has Anybody in the 21st century ever seen a poor politician? Nope, me neither.
 
Last edited:
You know this will come down to blaming Trump or the MAGA, tampon will find a way to do it, just a matter of time, very sad anyone got shot and killed, but my opinion this rhetoric has to stop on from both sides…..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top