testtest

SigP320 Safety Problems Continue – Resulting In Bans from Police Training Ranges!

Lab4Us said:
Likely. Pretty sure almost, if not all, with possible safety issues have been the basic duty issue types. None, or very few, of the upgraded fancy P320s. More likely they (theP320s involved in incidents) have been the off the basic assembly line models, inspected by no one. I’m sure if I bought a Wilson Combat collaboration P320 it would be fine because an actual armorer inspected it. I no longer own Sigs, but I am retired USAF, Security Police, but from the M-15/M9 days, so a dead Airman is concerning to me. As always, I wish all those that choose to enjoy their P320s the best and hope there is never another uncommanded discharge from a P320.
Click to expand...
If Wilson Combat had the answer, I doubt they would sit by and let injury and loss of life happen to folks not buying their adaptation of the 320.
 
SL66 said:
If Wilson Combat had the answer, I doubt they would sit by and let injury and loss of life happen to folks not buying their adaptation of the 320.
Click to expand...
I didn’t say they had the answers, I said at least a P320 from them would likely have been inspected by an actual armorer. Meaning, which I didn’t specifically state, that a gun from Wilson wasn’t going direct from an assembly line to an end user without an experienced human armorer looking it over.

If they did try to find, find, and had the answers for Sig, I am sure you are correct in they wouldn’t sit on that information.

FWIW, they still have some P320s available on their site, pretty sure with Wilson frames and Wilson modified slides. I doubt they’ve researched much of the Sig P320 chaos to find solutions for Sig.
 
Lab4Us said:
I didn’t say they had the answers, I said at least a P320 from them would likely have been inspected by an actual armorer. Meaning, which I didn’t specifically state, that a gun from Wilson wasn’t going direct from an assembly line to an end user without an experienced human armorer looking it over.

If they did try to find, find, and had the answers for Sig, I am sure you are correct in they wouldn’t sit on that information.

FWIW, they still have some P320s available on their site, pretty sure with Wilson frames and Wilson modified slides. I doubt they’ve researched much of the Sig P320 chaos to find solutions for Sig.
Click to expand...
Easy , did not mean to offend. All friends here. Thank you for clarification.
 
Annihilator said:
Sorry I don’t believe half the crap on YouTube about any firearm, there just made to get likes and such, most of these clips are staged….
Click to expand...
There usually drama and a point of view when it comes to any subject. I heard about this problem so many times now (with each person’s experience) that it has become old. I know each manufacturer has its issues (my M&P M2.0 10MM had its issues and was at the mothership before they moved) and each one does things differently.
 
I will say this while everyone here we have had a good cordial discussion and if a difference of opinion we discussed it so this is not met towards anyone here.

But I believe with all the YouTube knuckleheads and FB drive by posters. I believe the amount of 320 and duty carry experts I have seen and met now outnumber the Vietnam era Seals that have felt compelled to announce to me they were Vietnam Navy Seals!
 
Lab4Us said:
Never offended. Communications major. My responsibility to make sure messages I’ve sent are clear, which is sometimes challenging with text (and a few emojis) only. 😀 ☮️ … hmmm, that last was to indicate peace, not a B-52 airstrike …
Click to expand...
1754099497520.jpeg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top