MN.Militia
Professional
...Does that work in Call of Duty?? Asking for a friend.Yeah, but…..
You can throw the M17 at them and kill them like a grenade. Pin them down with “remotely deployed” covering fire at the very least![]()
...Does that work in Call of Duty?? Asking for a friend.Yeah, but…..
You can throw the M17 at them and kill them like a grenade. Pin them down with “remotely deployed” covering fire at the very least![]()
Doesn’t sound like it to me. Seems they’re (Sig) still maintaining …”the P320 is one of the safest and most advanced pistols in the world, meeting and exceeding all industry safety standards”. There are many striker fired handguns that don’t fully cock the striker when loaded, Of course Sigs answer is to never have a round in the chamber of a carried P320? Not sure I’d call that a very proficient “carry” configuration.Is Sig Changing Course?
Washington Gun Law
On the other hand, Sig is far from being "out of the woods"....
US Marshals Service Drops SIG P320
Guns & Gadgets 2nd Amendment News
Maybe if all these agencies reviewed their safety and marksmanship practices rather than jump on a bandwagon.
The national standards for law enforcement marksmanahip is a joke
Especially in the 3 letter agencies.
lets look at the SS footage of Trump![]()
Yeah, works great on the teens accusing you of camping…. So I’m told
Maybe if all these agencies reviewed their safety and marksmanship practices rather than jump on a bandwagon.
The national standards for law enforcement marksmanahip is a joke
Especially in the 3 letter agencies.
lets look at the SS footage of Trump![]()
Not that I’ve ever thought Air Force Times was the bastion of journalism, but that has to be the most non informational article I’ve read in a while!![]()
Air Force makes arrest in airman’s shooting death involving M18 pistol
The arrested airman is accused of multiple crimes, including involuntary manslaughter, the Air Force said.www.airforcetimes.com
If you want actual 2A news, the top source is Jared at Guns & Gadgets 2nd Amendment News.Not that I’ve ever thought Air Force Times was the bastion of journalism, but that has to be the most non informational article I’ve read in a while!
Ahh, best part of being a legal American citizen. We can make up our own minds and act accordingly and not have to succumb to what “experts” tell us or others personal opinions.If you want actual 2A news, the top source is Jared at Guns & Gadgets 2nd Amendment News.
Also, John Crump: youtube.com/@JohnCrumpNews
I post these guys & several others, daily, at FRIENDS of GOA & FPC on Gab.
My prediction is, even though military investigators are FAR from finished, Sig will use this news to once again proclaim that the P320 is 'safe' to infinity and beyond, and blame shooting victims for the reason why they got shot...
My beef with Sig isn't really about whether or not the P320 is inherently unsafe for owners; the incidents speak for themselves. Everyone can make up their mind in that regard, and act accordingly. No, my beef is how Sig treats its customer base. It's not cool to blame victims for being victims.
Everyone watching this debacle play out like the slo-mo train wreck this has become, keeps saying this is a master-class in how to NOT manage a PR nightmare, and it is one of their own making. At this point, my chief concern is what this Charlie Foxtrot is going to do to our 2A rights. We've been telling the anti-2A zealots for decades that "guns don't kill people, people do"; and now here's the P320 saying 'hold my beer'!
I am actually mildly surprised that with all of this playing out across the internet, the anti-freedom zealots haven't already noticed this and seized on it.
Agree 1000%. This is why I dumped ALL my Sigs a few years ago, not just the 3 P320s. And to be honest, two of those P320s were compacts which I’ve yet to see any reported incidents on. Terrible customer service SHOULD have terrible consequences for a business.Everyone can make up their mind in that regard, and act accordingly. No, my beef is how Sig treats its customer base. It's not cool to blame victims for being victims.