testtest

SigP320 Safety Problems Continue – Resulting In Bans from Police Training Ranges!

Status
Not open for further replies.
If Wilson Combat had the answer, I doubt they would sit by and let injury and loss of life happen to folks not buying their adaptation of the 320.
I didn’t say they had the answers, I said at least a P320 from them would likely have been inspected by an actual armorer. Meaning, which I didn’t specifically state, that a gun from Wilson wasn’t going direct from an assembly line to an end user without an experienced human armorer looking it over.

If they did try to find, find, and had the answers for Sig, I am sure you are correct in they wouldn’t sit on that information.

FWIW, they still have some P320s available on their site, pretty sure with Wilson frames and Wilson modified slides. I doubt they’ve researched much of the Sig P320 chaos to find solutions for Sig.
 
I didn’t say they had the answers, I said at least a P320 from them would likely have been inspected by an actual armorer. Meaning, which I didn’t specifically state, that a gun from Wilson wasn’t going direct from an assembly line to an end user without an experienced human armorer looking it over.

If they did try to find, find, and had the answers for Sig, I am sure you are correct in they wouldn’t sit on that information.

FWIW, they still have some P320s available on their site, pretty sure with Wilson frames and Wilson modified slides. I doubt they’ve researched much of the Sig P320 chaos to find solutions for Sig.
Easy , did not mean to offend. All friends here. Thank you for clarification.
 
Sorry I don’t believe half the crap on YouTube about any firearm, there just made to get likes and such, most of these clips are staged….
There usually drama and a point of view when it comes to any subject. I heard about this problem so many times now (with each person’s experience) that it has become old. I know each manufacturer has its issues (my M&P M2.0 10MM had its issues and was at the mothership before they moved) and each one does things differently.
 
I will say this while everyone here we have had a good cordial discussion and if a difference of opinion we discussed it so this is not met towards anyone here.

But I believe with all the YouTube knuckleheads and FB drive by posters. I believe the amount of 320 and duty carry experts I have seen and met now outnumber the Vietnam era Seals that have felt compelled to announce to me they were Vietnam Navy Seals!
 
LOL That's what LBJ said!! :ROFLMAO:
IMG_0538.jpeg
IMG_0539.webp
 
Good ole Strategic Air Command. I was in it from 1986-1992. I was at Malmstrom 91-93 and on June 1 1992 we went from SAC to Air Combat Vommand them a year or so later ACC didn’t want missiles because they wernt top gun like so we went to Soace Command. It was epic hell Ina. Hand basket whem SAC went away.

The AF tried coming back with Global Strike Command standing up in 2010 ish but it’s not there!

Good times!
 
Is Sig Changing Course?
Washington Gun Law


Doesn’t sound like it to me. Seems they’re (Sig) still maintaining …”the P320 is one of the safest and most advanced pistols in the world, meeting and exceeding all industry safety standards”. There are many striker fired handguns that don’t fully cock the striker when loaded, Of course Sigs answer is to never have a round in the chamber of a carried P320? Not sure I’d call that a very proficient “carry” configuration.

I continue to keep my hopes alive that those that continue to employ the P320 thinking there couldn’t possibly be safety problems with some samples of said gun NEVER suffer an uncommanded discharge harming themselves, family, friends, or other innocents.
 
I heard that when the US Marshals dropped the Sig P320, it jumped back up, cussed worse than a sailor, and promptly shot no less than a dozen Marshals before its slide locked to the rear. All are in stable condition and expected to recover.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top